coolcat6778
Вanned
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2024
- Messages
- 1,428
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2025
Is HSC Physics too dumb? | Atomi
"The HSC Syllabus basically misrepresents physics as a field. In fact, a brief survey of my fellow physics majors at UNSW reveals that not a single one of them enjoyed HSC Physics, because it was so unlike the problem solving of ‘real physics.’"
"The study of physical phenomena that the HSC syllabus does cover, from the motor effect to superconductivity, is limited to being able to regurgitate descriptions – we can’t learn about why they happen because the syllabus stipulates that you can’t use any real math. For example, we’re forced to study a butchered version of Bohr’s Postulates, because we’ve never been introduced to the concept of angular momentum, which is deemed to be beyond the HSC syllabus [was present in the pre 2000s syllabus though]. "
" One of the most disliked sections of first year physics is the experiment. Because this is where the most catching up is needed. The HSC Physics syllabus has exactly ONE quantitative experiment (measuring the acceleration due to gravity using a pendulum). Incidentally, this is also the first experiment you do at university, because they need to introduce you to the all important concept of actually calculating error, which is ignored totally by the HSC syllabus in favour of simply recognising that error exists and where it might come from. "
I don't know how there aren't any articles on how the current 2017 syllabus still sucks so much. These exact quotes applies to the current syllabus as well. Everyone thought they were getting VCE level physics (or even some how calculus in HSC physics) from reading all the old forum posts dating back to 2017. NESA hasn't done jack shit to fix these issues - the current syllabus is just the old late 2000s syllabus with lipstick
Last edited:
