Students helping students, join us in improving Bored of Studies by donating and supporting future students!
I just looked up their immigration policy and here it is in fullWait holy shit:
"The Commonwealth Government should place an immediate moratorium on (all) new immigration applications."
THEY ARE LOONS DO NOT VOTE FOR THEM.
It sounds sensible to me to limit population to within current environmental and resource limits. Isn't that what the greens want with sustainable population, and protection of our resources.S&F asserts that in order to limit the population of Australia to that which can be sustained within current environmental and resource limits, the Commonwealth Government should place an immediate moratorium on (all) new immigration applications. Such moratorium to remain in place until the Commonwealth has carried out an audit of Australia’s natural resources, in particular, water and energy, and until a referendum is held to set the optimum population levels.
Annual immigration levels shall be set so as to regulate maximum population to the mandated limit.
After reading your comment I have been looking at their policies to find this pillaging and rapping. The policies I found are all about protecting natural diversity and our rights of access to public land. They look better than the greens policies of locking up our bush and doing nothing to protect our native species except banning public access.why don't they rename themselves the pillagers and rapers party, since that's what they want to do to our forests and oceans
lol @ the black dudes being violent criminals
The NSW Greens actually have a comprehensive policy about conserving biodiversity, it's certainly not just "lock it up", have a read:After reading your comment I have been looking at their policies to find this pillaging and rapping. The policies I found are all about protecting natural diversity and our rights of access to public land. They look better than the greens policies of locking up our bush and doing nothing to protect our native species except banning public access.
http://www.shootersandfishers.org.a...he-environment-version-3rd-february-2011-.pdf
I took that policy as saying our environment should be put first. Humans are a very damaging species and very high human populations are unsustainable, so we should decide on the sustainable population of our country and not exceed it. I would have thought the greens would be all for this and find it strange they dont want to put a limit on our population.They're saying that they are going to halt any and all immigration in the immediate future to maybe reach some sort of arbitrary population figure.
Basically they're saying they hate immigrants but would hide behind false reasoning to legitimise it.
I just read the greens policy and it just seem to me to what we have now. I have heard that the area of national parks in NSW has recently doubled while the funds for the management of that area has hardly increased. Their policies are to spend more money in a system that is already failed. The state is already broke, where is the money for green policies coming from.The NSW Greens actually have a comprehensive policy about conserving biodiversity, it's certainly not just "lock it up", have a read:
http://nsw.greens.org.au/sites/greens.org.au/files/policydownloads/Biodiversity.pdf
the shooters & fishers policy boils down to advocating logging, fishing, horses and hunting dogs in conservation areas, and stopping the NPWS (like the people who actually run the national parks) from interfering with their recreational activities
The Shooters and Fishers Party strongly supports safeguarding our natural environment.
The best way to do this is not by 'locking it away' and restricting access in a forlorn hope of preserving it, but to actively manage the landscape to conserve and enhance biodiversity.
Communities are an essential element in this conservation paradigm, with out their active support and involvement all conservation efforts will fail. We recognise the ongoing degradation of our natural environment and that current management is not working.
We support the findings of the NSW Parliamentary Committee report 1 which recommended review of the current goals, objectives and priorities for biodiversity conservation, and to identify a new approach to biodiversity management.
The most recent national parks in NSW are in the Red Gum forests along the Murray. Selective logging there has prevented large fires, kept the forest open which prevented mass tree deaths due to the drought and for grasses and other species and protected habitat trees with hollows. Supurb parrot and Koala numbers have increased a lot due to this management. Now it is national park the redgums will become extremely thick, old habitat trees will die due to more competition from thicker tree stands. Eventually a fire will burn the whole forest wiping out all habitat trees and Koalas in one day. Before white settlment this area was mostly grasslands due to aboriginal burning, with very sparse redgums as redgums are not fire tolerent. Logging kept it in a more natural state and allowed increased biodiversity.can you explain how logging in national parks would help? lol.
The LDP do have some good policies, but area bit extreme for me.Dude they are total fucking loons oh my god don't vote shooters and fishers
vote
LDP
VOTE LDP VOTE LDP VOTE LDP
Yeah I guess individual freedom is a bit 'xtreem' heyThe LDP do have some good policies, but area bit extreme for me.
They would be better than Labur though.
As you correctly point out, the red gums were never there until Europeans changed the land use practices along the Murray. But there's nothing in the S&F policy to distinguish between this and ACTUAL old growth forest, which is irreplaceable.The most recent national parks in NSW are in the Red Gum forests along the Murray. Selective logging there has prevented large fires, kept the forest open which prevented mass tree deaths due to the drought and for grasses and other species and protected habitat trees with hollows. Supurb parrot and Koala numbers have increased a lot due to this management. Now it is national park the redgums will become extremely thick, old habitat trees will die due to more competition from thicker tree stands. Eventually a fire will burn the whole forest wiping out all habitat trees and Koalas in one day. Before white settlment this area was mostly grasslands due to aboriginal burning, with very sparse redgums as redgums are not fire tolerent. Logging kept it in a more natural state and allowed increased biodiversity.
agreedFor god sake, if there is one contest in this election which will not make a difference it is the LDP v Shooters.