actually don't bother. allow me to explain why this person is not from grammar, and hence why i'm so perplexed that you've all *whoever u all may be* have managed to deduce that he is infact a grammar boy.
firstly, for extension 1 and 2, grammar believe it or not, actually has more candidates. we have i beleive four classes of ext 2 maths for example. each class being of around 15-18 students is beyond the candidature posted. brian leung topped the trials for extension two posting 129/130, or something ridiculous like that.
in addition with regards to english, both advanced and extension.
firstly with advanced, once again our candidature was much more...
impressive to say the least =p. the person who topped this subject happened to be daniel wong, our dux and a close friend of mine. daniel wong does not in fact do french, and did not top ext 1 maths or english or ext two maths. with regards to the extension 1 english, i know as a fact that during the trials we sat the exam in a candidature of 69 students, 5 separate classes. the person who topped this subject was tim gootbrennan. he does not do french, more of a history and humanitarian person.
moreover, the person who topped french continuers and extension in grammar was ryan doherty. notice not any of the already mentioned names. although extremely bright, ryan does not in fact do four unit maths.
finally, i'd also like to mention that the MINIMUM requirement for a grammar student to do is in fact 12 units, this is due to reasons of a broader education as well as for a safety net in case one subject doesnt go as planned. ONLY students who are having trouble coping with this workload are able to apply to do 11 or even 10 units. The results u emailed me before do not indicate a weak student but show a marvellous set of results for 10 units.
for the reasons above, i'm lead to believe that this person is either a fraud or from another school. either way, i believe we can definitely conclude he is not a student of sydney grammar school 2005.
