blue_chameleon
Shake the sauce bottle yo
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2003
- Messages
- 3,078
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2003
To start of with, I guess the main reason i'm making this thread, is through curiosity as to how fellow students perceive Opus. I have a fair idea, but wanted to see if anyone had read the latest copy.
Ok so I picked up a copy of the latest Opus to kill boredom this afternoon. Had a chuckle on a few articles. Apart from the inability to read a lot of the text on the page, here's an article regarding VSU I found pretty funny...
Here's the main points of it...
Beyond that, I honestly don't get how they are trying to argue that it was about 'silencing opposition'. Seems they are bitter that the majority of students, now given the choice of whether to pay or not, are opting not to, because they don't feel they are getting value from any dollar they would spend. Clutching at straws, really.
tHeY aRe MaKiNg ThE wOrLd A bEtTeR pLaCe!!1!!! Awwwhhh.
End rant.
Ok so I picked up a copy of the latest Opus to kill boredom this afternoon. Had a chuckle on a few articles. Apart from the inability to read a lot of the text on the page, here's an article regarding VSU I found pretty funny...
Here's the main points of it...
Seriously guys, cmon. Chairman Rudd is now in power, and Johnny is long gone, as are the Libs.Regarding the introduction of VSU said:"Officially known as the Higher Education Support Bill 2005 this new legislation meant that universities were no longer able to charge membership fees or any other fees that were not related specifically to a course being studied by a student. It was a means by which the Howard Government could silence dissent. It was never about choice, about the right of students to choose to join their students association or not. It was about silencing opposition and it was forced upon students."
Beyond that, I honestly don't get how they are trying to argue that it was about 'silencing opposition'. Seems they are bitter that the majority of students, now given the choice of whether to pay or not, are opting not to, because they don't feel they are getting value from any dollar they would spend. Clutching at straws, really.
Pretty obvious that these guys fail to grasp the notion that given the choice, most students don't want to fork out hundreds of dollars a year to support a cause that they may not use their services for. Students would really be better off donating the funds to a charity that has more chance of assisting society as a whole i.e. Cancer Council/Breast Cander Foundation etc, and at least this way, they'd get a tax deduction too = win!NUSA's proposal for Universal Student Unionism said:"What we want is Universal Student Unionism (USU). We want universal membership to student associations. For students to fund their associations and not universities or the government so they can remain autonomous and continue doing the great work that they do."
Not sure about 'political' issues not receiving funding, but maybe I don't know as much as they do. It's probably that.Regarding the proposed new bill to 'reintroduce' Compulsory Fees said:"The Governments current talk of an up to $250 services levy is weak. There is no guarantee that this money will go to student unions. If it does, there will be many restrictions placed on its use. Whatever the Government/Uni deems as 'political' will not be funded by the levy. So much of what student unions do fits on the political spectrum, all of it integral to creating a better education system, society and world. And none of it will be able to happen with the Government's proposed levy."
tHeY aRe MaKiNg ThE wOrLd A bEtTeR pLaCe!!1!!! Awwwhhh.
End rant.
Last edited: