Originally posted by macca202
i was expecting somthing over 130 cos i know im pretty smart so i trired to porove it by doing the channel 9 one which i found on the internet. i was pretty cut when i found out i got 107, im now doubting a uai of >94. i reckon i went the worst at the start where they test you on definitions of words that ive never heard before. i think understanding strange words is definetely partly cultural based aswell as social based i guess. but i find it stupid how if an older person get sthe same amount of q's correct as a younger person then the older person gets a way higher IQ. its stupid cos how the fuck is a 16 year old supposed to know which movie won the whatever award in 1963 ???? Gone with the wind i think the answer was, obviously an older person would have more clue. and older ppl would know far more words than a younger person, they would know what a "by-law" (one of the q's) etc....... i found that that test was really stupid!!!!
Well the IQ test takes into account age. The same number of correct answers translates into different IQs depending on how old u r, and I think the younger u r, the higher ur IQ, not the converse....But I agree, still a dodgy system.
Don't worry about the UAI, if ur smart ur smart - u certainly didn't need Eddie McGuire's smirk to confirm that! perhaps just take it as a challenge to learn what a by-law etc is, becoz all the IQ test was demonstrate maybe 20 things u didn't know, rather than reflect on ur overall intelligence.
Anyway, I thought gone with the wind was 1939 not 1963...can't be sure tho.