Phanatical
Happy Lala
Best. Musical. Ever.
Best. Movie. Evar.
Discuss.
Best. Movie. Evar.
Discuss.
yes, it was a musical. which is exactly why they should have made an extra effort to make it possible to understand the lyrics so you could follow what was being said. and they couldn't have cut without compromising the story? its not part of the story if no one can understand wtf is going onPhanatical said:I don't see how they could have cut it any more without compromising the story. And as for the singing, IT'S A MUSICAL.
Emmy Rossum (Christine) is only 18, but she played the part so much more convincingly than Sarah Brightman ever did. Emmy Rossum is also a better singer than Sarah Brightman.malkin86 said:I've heard that the woman who plays Christine is better than Sarah Brightman - clearer and so on. What do you think?
I haven't seen either the film or the musical, although I read an English translation of the book, and I don't really like Raoul that much.
Katie Holmes was almost cast for the role of Christine, but the director said she was too old.astro said:apparently anne hathaway and keira knightely was asked to play Christine....
now i have to choose between phantom of the opera and finding neverland.....hmm, tough decision to make....
too late. the story was incoherent and crapPhanatical said:The lyrics were fine, it was very well sung. And they Did cut out stuff, which in my opinion should also have been left in. If you start cutting everything out, you lose the coherance of the story, and it just becomes crap.