Bookie
Banned
No, I'm just saying it applies for everyone.
Not primarily based on, but it plays a major role no?I wouldn't base a relationship simply on looks
yes thats true, besides that we like to get dressed up 4 ourselves and look preety we also do it to impress people!Schoolies_2004 said:Not primarily based on, but it plays a major role no?
I spose there is the argument that chix also waste of money etc on 'looks enhancing' things like make-up etc, but its less dramatic than having to hit the gym 2-3 times a week and having a related diet just so some chik is attracted to your abs....I mean....... you as an individual . Its an entire lifestyle change.
Thing is, if you can't stand how they look, you won't be able to stand them for long as more than a friend.azzie said:not on the most part.
maybe initial attraction is based on looks but not the "most part" of the relationship. when you roll over at 8 in the morning next to your girlfriend who has no makeup on, without her hair done nicely or dressed in anything flattering, you have to be able to kiss her and say "good morning, beautiful" and mean it.
being truley attractive to someone else isnt based on looks.
What would be a reasonable level of tonage for a lean person? (Generally speaking)
Schoolies_2004 said:
???
Im abit bigger than him though.............................................................
Schoolies_2004 said:IMO the problem with society is that chix are to superifical! Dudes will go for most chix, provided they are average or better, and have an ok personality. Chix on the other hand, they need some perfect guy who tix a 1000 of their boxes - 500 of which are related to looks
QUOTE]
I totally agree with u mate, chicks generally are just as bad (if not worse) than guys when it comes down to what they expect in their partner's looks, and they say otherwise just to be societally correct and to not appear shallow. Chicks want guys who are better in looks than themselves, whereas guys are willing to compromise and accept much less .
santaslayer said:I won't kiss her or say "good morning, beautiful" if she isn't. Therefore, relationships are based largely on how the person looks.
lol, no idea. can't say i've really seen much of that.Komaticom said:What about the muscles on boths sides near the top of the abs, layered about the ribs? They've never been rated, as far as I know.
serratus anterior, aka "the sexy rib muscles surfers get"Komaticom said:What about the muscles on boths sides near the top of the abs, layered about the ribs? They've never been rated, as far as I know.
Ultimate said:woah. I remember you. you're that really old guy.Schoolies_2004 said:IMO the problem with society is that chix are to superifical! Dudes will go for most chix, provided they are average or better, and have an ok personality. Chix on the other hand, they need some perfect guy who tix a 1000 of their boxes - 500 of which are related to looks
QUOTE]
I totally agree with u mate, chicks generally are just as bad (if not worse) than guys when it comes down to what they expect in their partner's looks, and they say otherwise just to be societally correct and to not appear shallow. Chicks want guys who are better in looks than themselves, whereas guys are willing to compromise and accept much less .