the semester before that's average was really low too, it's more to the way he marks exams and the questions he setsharu said:i recommend to pay attention to his book/lecture notes & do every single Q from the textbook. Last sem's midsem average was really low like low 50s.
yeh he is a moron lol. i remember once in a lecture they asked him to speak up, and he froze and stared at them for like 2 minutes and yelled at hte STUDENT for speaking! fucking moron i swear. i passed it with a 50 though my mate somehow got 76wrong_turn said:yeh he was a fag....
and yes i got owned in the subject
Plagerism???Loz_metalhead said:I ended up with a D but worked the hardest for it out of all my subjects last semester. For some reason I failed both assignment 2 and 3...but my friend who wrote something similar did a lot better and we had the same tutor
I heard about that, apparently the marking was cocked. there was a massive discussion on the fins2624 webct page everyone having a go at henry and the lack of consistency amongst tutors. i personally think hes a shit lecturer, but others thought he was great ?Loz_metalhead said:I ended up with a D but worked the hardest for it out of all my subjects last semester. For some reason I failed both assignment 2 and 3...but my friend who wrote something similar did a lot better and we had the same tutor
do you mean the toothpick and tea one? LOLftr11 said:Memorise his story about chopsticks and put/call options.
It will be in the exam.