Götterfunken
Member
Saying abortion = murder is grossly, and naively, oversimplifying the issue.
i dont remember who said it, but you're a fucking legend! I've been trying to say this all along.Don't have sex if you aren't willing to accept the costs (ie pregnancy)?
i gotta agree with this. im a chick, and i can imagine being pregnant just the same as a male can. I think the argument, girls, you need to be focusing on is the fact that guys dont know how to imagine having monthly periods. girls and guys can probably equally imagine being pregnant (if a chick has never been pregnant), but guys cant imagine getting periods. thats a different matter.Calculon said:So can I. I can imagine having a big cushion shoved down my shirt for 9 months, being sick every morning etc. Just because you have a vagina doesn't mean you can't "imagine" it better than someone who doesn't when neither of you have been through it.
dark_angel2611 said:I am personally pro-choice. Doesnt mean if i become pregnant im out the door having an abortion. It is just reassuring for me to have that option.
I think this is a silly statement. The difference between a piece of grass and a human embryo is that the latter will become a living, breathing person if it is allowed to grow to full term. The grass is technically a living organism but it has no conscious capacity of its own nor will it ever have. Thats why killing grass isn't considered a shame whereas killing a foetus is depriving it of the chance to become a person.dark_angel2611 said:Im not sure where life starts. Afterall this baby starts out as a couple of cells...isnt that what a piece of grass is? When does that turn into a life?
Time and time again preaching abstinence just does not work. Expecting people to suppress a natural urge is unrealistic. Rigorously teaching safe sex would be far more beneficial.grk_styl said:bottom line here people: if u aren't mature enough to face consequences then KEEP YOUR PANTIES ON!
Yes, I know that. My point was that an embryo, although not yet conscious, will develop into a person. Killing an embryo isn't doing it any intrinsic harm but it could be argued that it is being harmed extrinsically, it's being deprived of living a potential life.natstar said:An embyro doesent have conscious capability either
That's a debatable comparison to make. When you see a homeless child on the street do you think to yourself 'that kid would have been better off if it had never been born'?natstar said:I know what you mean, but letting an unwilling young girl for example bring a child into the world that she cannot look after fittingly, is kinda of depriving that chid of a life too
Well no that statement is not silly.it is correct. I was merely exploring where life did or did not start and the fact an embryo did start off as a couple of cells. I did not say it would never develop into anything more. and thankyou for preaching me on what grass is and is not. I really did need the clarification. I have not attacked your opinion except to defend my own so dont attack me or my opinion. That is what is simply silly here.Lundy said:I think this is a silly statement. The difference between a piece of grass and a human embryo is that the latter will become a living, breathing person if it is allowed to grow to full term. The grass is technically a living organism but it has no conscious capacity of its own nor will it ever have. Thats why killing grass isn't considered a shame whereas killing a foetus is depriving it of the chance to become a person.
You think I was "attacking" you because I said I thought your statement was silly (and proceeded to explain why)? Ok, feel free to be offended if it floats your boat.dark_angel2611 said:Well no that statement is not silly.it is correct. I was merely exploring where life did or did not start and the fact an embryo did start off as a couple of cells. I did not say it would never develop into anything more. and thankyou for preaching me on what grass is and is not. I really did need the clarification. I have not attacked your opinion except to defend my own so dont attack me or my opinion. That is what is simply silly here.
And i would like to ask all those people who are 100% anti-abortion how they feel about stem cell research involving embryos?just out of interest......
well yes thats true. and we're being taught safe sex yet people still arent listening. if people aren't going to take precautions, then like i said, they're not mature enough to have sex.Lundy said:Time and time again preaching abstinence just does not work. Expecting people to suppress a natural urge is unrealistic. Rigorously teaching safe sex would be far more beneficial.
In reality people impose their personal morals and ethics on ALL situations. *cough*Bush*cough*War*cough*hipsta_jess said:I think everyone here is imposing their own personal ethics and morals on the situation, when, in reality it is an intensely personal experience, and all the debating in the world isn't going to solve the issue.
The eternal problem is that immature people will do immature things. That's why they're immaturegrk_styl said:well yes thats true. and we're being taught safe sex yet people still arent listening. if people aren't going to take precautions, then like i said, they're not mature enough to have sex.
i know a couple who constantly have "pregnancy scares"...practically every time they have sex the condom breaks. (now im sure the guy needs to buy new condoms, but anyway) i keep telling the girl to go on the Pill JUST IN CASE, but she wont, coz "its not good having chemicals controlling ur body"...so instead she's going to have massive depressive months where she thinks she's pregnant.
in THOSE cases, she nor her boyfriend are mature enough to have sex.
ok so i know people cant suppress the urge, so instead, why dont we make sure tyhe condom doesnt break, and go on the pill. i dont get why so many chicks are so against going on the pill.
thats the sort of maturity im talking about
your friend = very big idiot. tell her to do biology.grk_styl said:"its not good having chemicals controlling ur body"...
Both of them are murdernatstar said:How does abortion different from executing someone who is on death roe. Isent that murder also
This is interesting... very unexpected. Maybe this is by chance though? I wonder why it is if it isn't (by chance)...hipsta_jess said:Actually, I've read studies that have shown men have a stronger instant bond with their child than mothers do.
If the parents never saw the baby, and it was put in a nursery full of other babies, the fathers picked the 'right' baby correctly a significant number of times higher than the mothers.