Prestige: important factor, or most important factor? (1 Viewer)

[Captain Gh3y]

Discuss.

 

[katie tully]

i go to csu

can i still comment?

 

[Enteebee]

Male:Female ratio in course is probably the most important.

 

[BackCountrySnow]

^^
why else would someone take psychology?

 

[cannibal.horse]

IMO most important factor.

If one was doing a B Cocksucking or B Piitb then one should certainly go to UWS cause it's got the prestige and the practical element which USyd and UNSW lack.

However, it would be acceptable if a student didn't get the required UAI to complete their undergraduate B Cocksucking at Macquarie and do their masters at UWS.

 

[xeuyrawp]

In order:

1. Coursework variety,
2. library and collections,
3. teachers and researchers,
4. current fieldwork,
5. pretty campus, facilities, etc.

Some of the best places for me are really shitty prestige-wise (eg Liverpool), although others are awesome (Oxford, Heidelberg, Chicago), not that I've ever really considered it as a major factor.

 

[Omnidragon]

Eh... no
If people recognise prestige for what it is, it won't be worth anything because they know in terms of actual results it's the same everywhere

 

[doink]

I think that in a third and long situation bringing in the cornerback to blitz the weak side is a bit of a gamble, againts inexperienced quarterbacks it is likely to pay off with a sack however if you are up against a veteran they can pick the play with ease and expect the wide receivers on the weak side to be wide open for a first down.

 

[Captain Gh3y]

I think that in a third and long situation bringing in the cornerback to blitz the weak side is a bit of a gamble, againts inexperienced quarterbacks it is likely to pay off with a sack however if you are up against a veteran they can pick the play with ease and expect the wide receivers on the weak side to be wide open for a first down.

agreed, good post

 

[xoa]

Prestigious unis in Australia?

Is a McEducation™ at UNSW more prestigious than a McEducation™ at UWS?

 

[blue_chameleon]

Haha. This thread reminds me of a crack Politik made about a certain uni not being of the upper echelons, but it wasn't based on what he knew rather what he didn't know.

Great guy.

 

[wookie skimmer]

I think that in a third and long situation bringing in the cornerback to blitz the weak side is a bit of a gamble, againts inexperienced quarterbacks it is likely to pay off with a sack however if you are up against a veteran they can pick the play with ease and expect the wide receivers on the weak side to be wide open for a first down.

arrr but if the cornerback only fakes the blitz and instead the strong side is loaded with blitzers and the cornerback drops back into a zone coverage he would be screwed

 

[Davo1111]

fuck, we really need an FAQ just like on the L&R Forums.

@ OP - yes go to JCU or UWS okay? Whatever makes you happy!