yanananananana said:
I think all threads about religion should be banned... i mean... yeah it does let people voice their opinions but at the end of the day someone always gets hurt because either they or their religion are being criticised...
Technically it shouldnt be possible to hurt someone because of what they believe. Many people believe things that dont harmonise with other peoples way of thinking. That doesnt mean they should feel hurt, or feel the need to change what they believe.
If you truly believe something you have to question why you believe in it. The problem with having "blind faith" is that some people are bound to walk you into a wall.
If you are confidentin what you believe, nothing anybody can say should sway you unless its a good argument based on truth. Most critisisms are made up on the spot or are based on half truths. So any critisism directed at you/what you believe shouldnt affect you.
As you said... its your life believe what you want.
Nick said:
iwhat if jesus didnt really die on the cross, as he wasnt up there long enough, and that he actually travelled via the spice route to india to escape the romans, where he lived out the rest of his days.
There are 2 things wrong in this paragraph.
The first thing is the words "what if". Nothing that starts with what if is ever true. There is one sure fire way of knowing that Jesus really did die. Consult the history books.
The bible says that jesus was crucified on a roman cross. Whats so special about that? Romans had been executing people for centuries. They knew how to kill someone and they knew how to check if they were dead.
Once someone has been dead for a while, their heamoglobin and plasma seperate. So the romans would stab people in the chest and if water (they didnt know it was plasma) and blood came out, they were dead. They cannot make a mistake about that. They were very profficient in killing people.
The second thing wrong is that "if" Jesus didnt die, which he did, every single christian that has ever lived has put their faith in something wrong. We know that not to be the case. Jesus was pretty powerful to defeat death, and from heaven show one of the smartest men around how true he really was.
Paul was a pharisee. For jewish people, he was one of the best most godly people alive. There was no doubt that he knew more about being a jew, and about God, then anyone. Yet something happened to change his life.
He was blinded on the road to damascus and had to follow Jesus' instructions to be healed. That led him to know something big was going on. He knew the bible perfectly, and because of that he knew that all signs pointed to Jesus being the Son of God.
If Paul had such a dramatic change of heart, its not something that he just decided to follow. Its something he knew, and i also know to be true.
I don't believe jesus did go elsewhere to learn budhism. If it was something that important, it would have been put in the bible. If youre writing a short book about someones life you dont want to put everything in... just the most important parts. And i think learning another religion is important.
You can believe that Jesus went to India. But i dont think he did. I reckon budhism is just a way of living that treats every living being as equal and important. Do you not think that the person through whom all things are made should not feel the same way about his creation? If every person was my brother or sister, should i not treat them equally? Hell yes... and thats what I am called by God to do.
Budhism is a moral way of living. Christianity is living to please the God who gave us those morals. The only real difference there should be between the two is that Christians have a saviour because we cant live morally in this corrupt world.