MedVision ad

Riemann Hypothesis (1 Viewer)

KeypadSDM

B4nn3d
Joined
Apr 9, 2003
Messages
2,631
Location
Sydney, Inner West
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
Originally posted by buchanan
Actually, maybe we even have pi(x)=Li(x)+O(x<sup>1/2</sup>), but that's stronger than RH and could be false even if RH is true.
Hasn't that been proven false?

And when it says for big oh of Sqrt[x]Ln[x], what constant are we meant to chuck out the front for the R.H. to be true? Because we can chuck out 10<sup>10<sup>10<sup>10<sup>10<sup>10</sup></sup></sup></sup></sup> and that might be true ...
 
Joined
Jul 7, 2002
Messages
722
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Most mathematicians believe the RH to be true. One (amongst only a few) who did not believe it was Atle Selberg. It saddens me to have to report here that he died a couple of days ago. He won the 1950 Fields Medal for his proof of the Prime Number Theorem - a more elementary one than ones previously available.



Selberg, A. "An Elementary Proof of the Prime Number Theorem." Ann. Math. 50, 305-313, 1949.
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top