SAM vs JUAI (1 Viewer)

[omar273]

Since these two predictors use the same 2004 UAC statistics and results, why do they scale some subjects differently, therefore giving a different aggregate and giving a different UAI prediction?

Oh, and i'm pretty sure that for JUAI 2004, when one enters a relatively high aggregate, it gives a UAI of 100.00, even though it is prpbably around 99.85+

 

[Lazarus]

The published statistics aren't exhaustive - there are a lot of gaps that need to be filled in.

The two programs use different methods for estimating those 'in between' figures.

 

[Star_Empress]

could someone give me the site for the JUAI program pls?