Innocent!
Definantly innocent!
they refused to take fingerprints, they refused to test for DNA although she had even offered to pay for it, they asked her to pay them money to reduce the sentence. u saw the judges reading a book, not paying attention while she made her last appeal.
it was a huge amount of marijuana being taken INTO bali whereas bali is a huge EXPORTER of it, it made no sense to be smuggling it in when it was cheaper to buy it over there.
it was a huge amount there was no chance it wouldnt be picked up if she was searched, she really couldnt be that stupid. it was in her bodyboard bag which obviously wasnt locked and wasnt with her most of the time.
the story she offered was the only one that made any sense, plus it was backed up by an inmate in jail who overheard other inmates laughing about how the drugs had ended up in bali and she was being tried for it. they said itd been destined for sydney from brisbane and customs dont check internal flights so there was no risk of being found. however when they put it in her bag they didnt know she was coming from brisbane to sydney to take a connecting flight to bali.
they thort the bag was only travelling interstate. the inmate offered to give evidence in bali on her behalf but the indonesian govt. wouldnt allow it.
besides u wouldnt give the death penalty to a drug smuggler!!!!!!!!! (the bali bomber got three years, coz he paid em off... talk about corrupt!)