I'm pretty sure these are the only differences for me.lolcal said:7. A
16. D
subsidies lower the price.lolcal said:it's a quota, subsidies don't change the price.
Yeah its Q9. You got it right the answer is C as only a quota will cause the price to rise.christiina.h said:what was the one with the diagram and the increase in the domestic price?? i can't remember what question number that was, my friends said it was the subsidies one because i put the quota one but does a quota have a straight line down instead
thats what i thought.Geohood said:12D would crowding out effect though wouldn't it?
This multiple choice test was the most confusing I've ever done.
With Q7, unemployment can't lower past the natural rate unless there is structural change. With 16, the AIRC had a larger role in the centralised wage determination system, however enterprise bargaining is part of the centralised system. So I think 7A and 16D.BackCountrySnow said:I'm pretty sure these are the only differences for me.
7.C
and 16 i had no idea, so i put A.
How could it be a quota? A quote on that graph would create a vertical line (on or to the right of equilibrium).lolcal said:it's a quota, subsidies don't change the price.
i meant raise itBackCountrySnow said:subsidies lower the price.
A would lower the price. B would lower the price. D enables the domestic producers to supply more (lower price). B is the only answer that matches the graph (increase in price).jasonml said:How could it be a quota? A quote on that graph would create a vertical line.
it isn't a specific graph, it's what trade policy would have that effect. a quote imposes an artificial limit on supply, hence the price increases.jasonml said:How could it be a quota? A quote on that graph would create a vertical line.
Yeah. I agree. A quota decreases supply, which increases the price, which is seen in the graphlolcal said:it isn't a specific graph, it's what trade policy would have that effect. a quote imposes an artificial limit on supply, hence the price increases.
Your logic is wrong. First of all, even though a) is wrong, a reduction in tariffs will clearly change the price (albeit downwards).seano77 said:Yeah its Q9. You got it right the answer is C as only a quota will cause the price to rise.
D is the crowding out effect, but thats in indirect effect on stability.BackCountrySnow said:thats what i thought.
Ahhh.... no. Have you ever seen a Subsidies graph? Its Cjasonml said:Your logic is wrong. First of all, even though a) is wrong, a reduction in tariffs will clearly change the price (albeit downwards).
Subsidies also change price.
Answer = d)
okay tops thanks !lolcal said:it's a quota, subsidies don't change the price.