I am sorry but personal preference is built upon the personal opinions that we hold and it appears from your post that you are babbling on about your own personal opinion. Genearal contradiction is always in place in a thread like this.Telekinetik said:I'm sorry but personal preference should not come into this debate - English shouldn't be made an elective just because a lot of people don't like the topic.
Anywayys, English SHOULD, and always will be, made compulsory -- the question is however on the content that is being taught. If anyone is learned enough they can see how many postmodernist assumptions are implicit in every single module. It's ridiculous.
Similarly, the English Advanced (and I'd assume Standard) syllabi revolve around texts 'representations of TEXT', 'TEXTS, values & context', 'critical study of TEXT', 'comparative study of TEXT'. The focus should not be on texts, it's more a class of literature than anything (with films, etc thrown in) -- the focus instead should be clearly set in the English language itself.
I'm drawling here and LOL you can tell I've been writing English practice responses 5 minutes before writing this -- I sound like a douche.
But yeah, just because you f'ers can't deal with letters (not pronumerals) and words instead of your 'precious numbers', doesn't mean that it should be labelled redundant.
Should Math be made compulsory?
yeh i have to agree with you iyounamulyounamu said:I am sorry but personal preference is built upon the personal opinions that we hold and it appears from your post that you are babbling on about your own personal opinion. Genearal contradiction is always in place in a thread like this.
History buffs unite!sonyaleeisapixi said:^ fellow five unit history-er <3
Can we express ourselves clearly? Because I know a few people doing Extension 1 English that can't, haha, sorry to those people. If people can articulate themselves well than the subject should be focused on refining those skills -- writing essays based on arguments (however at same time not trying to assert postmodernist assumption that context influences and will influence everything in its path~).barbecuedflava said:what else is there to learn? we all know how to speak and express ourselves efficiently. but yeh, we dont really learn english, its more literature, it should be called literature
even tho i dont really like english i think it has to be compulsory, no argument here - its the language we communicate in here in Australia
and tho i really like maths i dont think it should be compulsory
I'm sorry, what I meant to say is that people shouldn't be voting no because they simply do not like the subject or are not good at it, etc. They should base their personal opinions on something more solid than their own likes and dislikes.lyounamu said:I am sorry but personal preference is built upon the personal opinions that we hold and it appears from your post that you are babbling on about your own personal opinion. Genearal contradiction is always in place in a thread like this.
oh, there are oversea students that has only been in Australia for less than 2 years. And many socialise only with their own backgrounds, talking only their own language...lyounamu said:People aren't that dumb, you know.
agree..foram said:English sucks. It should only be compulsary for people who did badly in the SC.
The majority of people who vote english to be compulsary are women.
This is EXACTLY what happened to a mate of mine, 95+ in both his math exams, 68 in english = 71UAI. As a result he missed out on his computer science uni course and had to do a bridging course which added an extra 2 years to his degree.Q2C-ME said:cohesion arising for migrants from compulasary english is evident....lol i kno so mani schools, top ones where the top 5 are dominated by ethnics....then again i question the syllabus and wheter its realli a test of literature....but yeaa....it should b compulsary, but content should b less and more focus on the SKILLS rather than the REGGERGETATION, AND it shuldnt count towards ur UAI as this current system destroys the window of oppourtunity for a reall realli smart maths kid to absolutly rape hsc...if he gets 60 in english. then again....realli smart maths kids wuldnt even bother with HSC
p.s. im ethnic...the end
see, the thing is, id read your whole post, but my quick look registered your horrible misspelling of regurgitation, overuse of ellipsis, and constant use of "realli" which is supposed to be "really".Q2C-ME said:cohesion arising for migrants from compulasary english is evident....lol i kno so mani schools, top ones where the top 5 are dominated by ethnics....then again i question the syllabus and wheter its realli a test of literature....but yeaa....it should b compulsary, but content should b less and more focus on the SKILLS rather than the REGGERGETATION, AND it shuldnt count towards ur UAI as this current system destroys the window of oppourtunity for a reall realli smart maths kid to absolutly rape hsc...if he gets 60 in english. then again....realli smart maths kids wuldnt even bother with HSC
p.s. im ethnic...the end
HOMO123ash said:Yes, english is an important subject. i am a good maths student and in years 7,8,9 and 10 i really hated english because i thought it is so irrelevent.to me shakespeare is "gay" was the biggest cliche. But my opinion changed in preliminary studies and i started to enjoy english equally as much as maths. Literature is important for the community.