inasero
Reborn
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2002
- Messages
- 2,497
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2003
Again, please shut up and stop attacking Christian theology...especially since you're not one yourself you are in no position to criticize anything. You don't see me criticizing the Koran now do you? If you were such a learned and educated scholar as you make yourself out to be, then you wouldn't be wasting so much time trying to discredit other religions and you would be arguing the validity of your own "religion" more so.Inasero, im not trying to undervalue the christian faith or discredit it..im simply asserting the fact that Christians sometimes tend to follow their scholars, bibles etc. a bit too blindly. Most christians have no knowledge of their histroy and the different councils, philosophers etc. that were needed to develop the christian faith. Half of the teachings, dogma, theological concepts etc. were NEVER taught by Jesus and these are well-known facts, just research "Christian histroy". The trinitarian doctrine you follow today was introduced by Constantine and the basic idea that jesus is the son of god was introduced by St. Paul so that he can bring christianity to the Gentiles and lend creedence to the idea that jesus died for our sins....this is an inarguable fact. What right did paul and the rest of the theoligians of the time have in creating their own concept of god which wasnt taught by jesus in the first place.... jesus never taught that he was the son of god, except in a metaphorical sense and you'd understand what im saying if you read the hebrew verison of the bible.
I have alot of problems with your arguments and these stem from the fact that you are making sweeping assumptions without trying to support your arguments.
1. If you're not trying to discredit Christianity I don't see why you are still sprouting nonsense from your mouth. Christians don't follow blindly, as I have said previously. How many Christians have you had an intellectual discussion with lately? Christians (not the nominal "Sunday Christians") are continually studying the scriptures and trying to improve their knowledge of early church history. If Christians are just sheep then I'd hate to think what Islam is- what's praying five times a day and wearing a Hijab? Is that just "following their scholars a bit blindly"? Tell me one single reason why you think that Christians follow blindly. Just one. I'm sure it wouldn't be too difficult for a learned scholar like you.
2. Christians don't know anything about history? Please...your argument is so childish- it doesn't serve to prove anything. For one thing, Christians do know about their own Church history (refer to above). And what if Christians do not? It doesn't matter because that's not a requisite for salvation and it doesn't take rocket science to figure out the Gospel.
3. In fact there are only 27 books in the NT compared with 39 in the OT. So yes, even less than half of what is in the Bible doesn't come from the mouth of Jesus directly. But what are you hoping to prove by raising that? It doesn't prove anything.
"But as for you, continue in what you have learned and have become convinced of, because you know those from whom you learned it, and how from infancy you have known the holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness" (2 Timothy 3:14-16). Even if the Old Testament weren't teachings of Jesus, they were planned beforehand by God so why should it be any less accepted? After all, Jesus IS God. Refer to next point.
4. Paul never introduced this idea. It was fact just as it's fact that Tasmania lies south of Victoria. Furthermore, why would a zealous persecutor of Christians turn around 180 degrees and support a doctrine which effectively validates the claims of Christianity? We know for sure that it wasn'r for personal gains since Christians were persecuted by Jews and Romans alike at the time.
5. Inarguable? I've just argued it. I'd like to hear your rebuttal, learned scholar. I'm sure it will be of merit and very scholarly, not to mention scientific!.
6. Jesus wasn't the Son of God? The Hebrew Bible says it and so does the modern English translation-
"This is my beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased" (Matthew 17:5)
"Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me"" (John 14:6)
"And this is the testimony: God has given us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. He who has the Son has life; he who does not have the Son of God does not have life." (1 John 5:11-12)