You're right. There is a difference in the way marking criteria are applied in these two subjects.
I think there is a cultural difference, as in scientific cultural difference.
Analytical Chemists value accuracy, validity and not over-stating the precision in a measurement or a calculation. When they write down the chemical composition of food, water or pharmaceuticals they know their job could be on the line if they get it wrong, or a product could be recalled from the market. Hence they frown at answers that infringe on these three criteria, especially students who naively over-state the precision (number of sig figs) in their answers.
Physicists value laws, mathematical formulae and critical reasoning and they are not as hung up about number of sig figs in an answer. They know their job won't be on the line if they over-state the precision of a the mass of a packet of Corn Flakes to more sig figs than is really justified.
That's my theory.