Wow you're real cool, pointing out a typo.WhiteD69 said:What does decieded mean? Decimated maybe?
I know... and that's what I said too...lou071 said:I said I am NOT blaming students or technology.
I am just saying that extra 15 given to students
was very unfair for everyone who does same course
Yes.midifile said:Wow you're real cool, pointing out a typo.
I must be an idiot because I can't spell decided
Blame the ivigalotrars.lou071 said:I said I am NOT blaming students or technology.
I am just saying that extra 15 given to students
was very unfair for everyone who does same course
nothinglou071 said:What do you think the Board of Studies will do about this issue?
Exactly. And that is why this issue must also be taken to ACA and TT and other reputable media networks, so that something can be done.midifile said:nothing
james ruse is their baby. They like to show that public (albeit selective) schools can continually top the state
But there is nothing they can do to make it fair.lou071 said:ummm..... i see what you mean,
but isn't that just so unfair?
if they do nothing about it, then how are they gonna
take all complains etc?
By comparing their marks to their internal results, and to their results in Ext 2.midifile said:But there is nothing they can do to make it fair.
Say, student A got 84/84 in the 2 hours and spent the extra 15 minutes checking over it (but obviously didnt get any extra marks), and student B got 75/84 in the 2 hours and spent the extra 15 minutes getting a few extra marks.
How do they distinguish between the students who would have got that mark rightfully in the 2 hours and those that earnt extra marks in the last 15 minutes?
Still not a fair comparison. Hundreds of factors contribute to a students performance in a test, comparing the internal results and the ext 2 marks (assuming that everyone who did MX1 did MX2 (which obviously did not happen)) can't neccesarily give an accurate reflection of their perfomance in the 3u examWhiteD69 said:By comparing their marks to their internal results, and to their results in Ext 2.
Internal marks are a good judge.midifile said:Still not a fair comparison. Hundreds of factors contribute to a students performance in a test, comparing the internal results and the ext 2 marks (assuming that everyone who did MX1 did MX2 (which obviously did not happen)) can't neccesarily give an accurate reflection of their perfomance in the 3u exam
your paragraphing style reminds me of William Carlos Williams.lou071 said:I am not sure how they can give the fair mark
(by look into the mark) cos
this year's exam was hard
about 15 extra minutes
and hundred other things they consider when they
determine band and mark.
....you can't use raw internal marks to determine the ability of a student...WhiteD69 said:Internal marks are a good judge.
yes, and the UAC scalinglou071 said:do u think this issue will affect the cutoff mark for bands for this year?
so much dependsWhiteD69 said:your paragraphing style reminds me of William Carlos Williams.