Re: Grey Council's question:
Yes, I am serious. Obviously saying you can do actuarial is not the same as saying you'll do well at it - that depends on whether it's stuff you'll enjoy doing, because it is different in a lot of ways to high school math. Interesting, but different.
Re: turtle's comments:
He's just biased
(of course, so am I, because stats is so much bludgier than pure maths, meaning that I like the latter because it's interesting, and the former because it's not completely boring and is relatively easy
)
Besides, you do some measure theoretic stuff in third year actuarial as well, even if it's not necessarily called such. (Anyone wanting to know what measure theory is, consult mathworld.wolfram.com, which gives a reasonable definition after some running around. If you don't understand it, don't worry - it's not taught until third year pure maths in any event)
It's just that the first two years are where it'll be more obvious that what you're doing is just maths, as opposed to being set in the real world (though a lot of examples are application-based, as are the assignments).
Oh, and specifically to turtle:
Oi! Don't knock stats. It's better than applied by a mile, and better than most of the physics related maths (ignore the bits where the two overlap).
Plus you could (as a Med student) try and weasel your way into the Medical Statistics subject being run this year...