success_one
tykte6kt6yuk
Anyone have solutions for SOR 2004 CSSA TRIAL???????
Sounds like a request to me!! Its good to see the standard at other schools.....acmilan1987 said:12(a) Demonstrate the influence of Christianity on the development of One of the following areas in Australian society since 1901: Education (3 marks)
Christianity has allowed the development of an education system today where people have a choice whether to send their children to free, secular educational institutes or ones that have a religious syllabus included. Catholics were a major instigator for State Aid to Christian schools. One major incident was the deliberate shutdown of a Catholic school in Goulburn so that it would be known to the government that the works of such Christian schools were important to the community. Subsequently, State Aid was eventually granted after much lobbyinh and Private schools today receive greater funding by both State and Federal government than public schools. The result is a freedom of choice in the education system one's child receives
12(b) Discuss the responses of TWO religious traditions to ONE of the following issues: Poverty (Christianity and Judaism) (7 marks)
Poverty is an important aspect of Christian worship. Christianity has developed a number of charitable institutions to help the oppressed and poverty stricken, including the Salvation Army (Anglican), St Vincent de Paul (Catholic) and Wesley Mission (Uniting Church). Christianity not only gives charity, but prefers to teach the poor how to reclaim their lives. Many church leaders have actually challenged the cause of poverty in government, releasing many reports on the issue. Judaism and its followers have a duty to show the oppressed and exploited the unconditional love and compassion that God gives to them. This has given rise to a number of charitable institutions for the poor, but like Christians, they do not only give money, but also teach the poor how to get back up on their feet. The Gemilut Chasidim is an attitude to give the poor what they truely deserve and what is rightfully theirs. The Jews themselves have personal experiences in being oppressed and exploited and this has resulted in them realising the oppression of others. Both Christians and Jews play important roles in not only trying to help those that are suffering from poverty, but also challenging the government policies that keep making people poor. One good example is when the talks of the GST started, many chuch leaders lobbied that it would make more people poorer and hence allowed and convinced the government to not include the GST on various food products. These two religions have played vital roles on the issure on poverty in Australia right up to today and will continue to.
If anyone is interested i can also type up my Ethics in Christianity and Judaism which i also got full marks for. I wont type it up unless requested
have not had the chance to look....but if your previous posts are of a similar standard, top band sounds about right (17-20).acmilan1987 said:What do you reckon snapperhead, is it worth the 20 marks, personally i didnt think so when i wrote it, i was hoping for about 18
snapperhead said:CSSA 2004 trials ethics marking criteria
@chicken person
I would say that your teacher *may* have taken a liberal approach to the marking criteria (ie to give out 3*20 marks-assuming its a small class that is) though they are sort of right about mentioning what you have studied. It makes the markers life a little easier if you identify straight away what you are talking about (refer to both criteria and the little blurb at the top of the CR studies question- the term escapes me at the moment).
I highly doubt you will get a HSC question that doesnt specify/refer to a syllabus area (either 'sources' or 'types') as it would be a truly crappy question.....
what sort of question?absolution* said:But Snapperehead, if this sort of question came up in the HSC you wouldnt refer to a separate part of the the syallabus in mentioning marriage and divorce or bioethics or whatever would you? Unless it asks... Seems like if you discuss those things your discussing the wrong syallbus dot-point altogether.
I think they meant the ethics question which was on this CSSA trial. If this question came up in the HSC, would you include the stuff on marriage & divorce, etc?... Which i'm guessing you would ("If it were me and they asked a lame question, I would be throwing everything in I know in and tying it to the question as best I could to justify 20 marks.")snapperhead said:what sort of question?
Sorry to carry on but I still dont get what you mean "if this sort of question came up in the HSC". What sort of question?
*sigh*absolution* said:What im saying is that if they wanted someone to discuss marriage and divorce then they would have used this dot point as the basis of the question:
∑ religious ethics and their effect on the everyday lives of believers:
– the way in which TWO traditions give ethical guidance to ONE of the following areas:
- violence, war and peace
- bioethics, eg cloning, genetic engineering, IVF, euthanasia
- the environment
- work ethics and business/professional ethics
- sexual ethics
- marriage and divorce.
As opposed to using a seprate dot-point which is only asking to evaluate the sources of ethics from:
– sacred stories and texts
– beliefs
– individual and communal experiences
– authority within religious structures
I see no reason as to include marriage and divorce in the question and id go by a similar format to the essay which was previously typed up and posted.
Without meaning to sound rude (which Im not), it doesnt matter what you think or feel is right for the question, its what the syllabus and the exam setters think is correct for the question!! This is why they make the syllabus available to students and this is why they put the (marking) rubric into the paper!see no reason as to include marriage and divorce in the question