Uni election halted amid 'violence'
It would be great if the issue was discussed without resorting to generalisations that paint student politics in its entirety, or just those on the left, as being inherently violent (some will, no doubt).Uni election halted amid 'violence'
Lisa Macnamara
October 05, 2005
OFFICIALS at a Victorian university have ordered a halt to student elections and launched an investigation into allegations of intimidation and threats of violence.
The day before RMIT elections for positions on the university council and student union were due to finish last week, the independently appointed returning officer, Jamie Adam, stopped the campaigning when three of the main parties - the left-leaning No VSU and Active, as well as the centre-right Nexus - were caught up in allegations of threats of violence.
"It was too volatile a situation," Mr Adam said yesterday.
The Australian understands the three parties accused each other of threatening physical violence while campaigning at the university's Swanston Street campus.
"Given the environment, we thought it was best to shut it down," Mr Adam said. "But the polling remained open."
RMIT's director of student services Jane Stewart described the campaigning as "over enthusiastic, to the point where it's actually begun to impact on the democratic process".
"Students may have been approaching others, in ways, to get them to vote in certain ways," he said.
While the warring parties were reluctant to detail the nature of the allegations, RMIT's pro vice-chancellor, Joyce Kirk, told The Australian: "We are taking the matter very seriously. It will be investigated to ensure the integrity of the election process, both for the university and our students."
Student Union president Sridaran Vijayakumar said he knew only that the campaigning had ceased because of allegations.
"We were told the campaigning was going to stop and we would be notified at a later date," he said. "We don't know what these allegations are, because the university's not going to tell us, they're just going to inform us whatever decision they make when they make it."
Mr Adam said counting had been disrupted by the investigation.
Despite the disruption to the campaign, voting went ahead. But Mr Adam said the investigation remained an obstacle to counting the votes.
"It's a question of working out who's done what before anyone is elected, in light of this investigation."