[Teacher POV] 2023 HSC Extension 1 Solution Speedrun Send Help (1 Viewer)

epicmaths

Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2023
Messages
43
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Hiya,

In the mood to write up the solutions - the immediate feedback from my students was "hard". They probably overstudied the recent HSCs.

Backseating my poor algebra is welcome!


youtube: epicmaths

Link to First Draft of the solutions is on the youtube live page for that stream!
 
Last edited:

Luukas.2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2023
Messages
441
Gender
Male
HSC
2023
For the volume question, the bottom part is just a cylinder with , so skip integration.

For the top part, we can make the numbers a lot easier to deal with...


And, the question could have been asked as: Show that the volume is

 
Last edited:

=)(=

Active Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2021
Messages
649
Gender
Male
HSC
2023
For the volume question, the bottom part is just a cylinder with , so skip integration.

For the top part, we can make the numbers a lot easier to deal with...


And, the question could have been asked as: Show that the volume is

wait if i did ln12/4 and didnt simplfy would i lose a mark ( ik its stupid i was stressed)
 

Luukas.2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2023
Messages
441
Gender
Male
HSC
2023
For 14(c), Let p be the projection of a onto b. Then the vector a - p is the the altitude of the triangle with base as b, and so

area of triangle, A = |b||a - p| / 2
It's another "otherwise" approach...
 

epicmaths

Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2023
Messages
43
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
[[drive.google.com/drive/folders/1TWaMpXobf7MHLrhus5L3YmUx5wcR69nH?usp=sharing]]

The pdf from the past 2 hours.
Aye I'll collate some of the better ways for 14c as they come in.
 

Luukas.2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2023
Messages
441
Gender
Male
HSC
2023
For 14(c)(ii), the product rule can be avoided. Working towards the form of A that I have here may be quicker, too.


There are two solutions, , because the domain is and the function is even. The stationary points at are the minima.
 

Luukas.2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2023
Messages
441
Gender
Male
HSC
2023
Also, 11e is easy by sketching y = sin x and y = cos x and adding... the solution x = 0, pi/2, 2pi drops immediately.
 

Luukas.2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2023
Messages
441
Gender
Male
HSC
2023
Here is yet another "otherwise" approach.



Yes, I saw it, thanks. It's definitely the easy way so long as you have covered cross products of 3D vectors, which is beyond MX2 content and well beyond MX1.

The approach that @epicmaths took, using , and Lucid's solutions, are both "otherwise" methods too.

I really wonder about the intended method using the information given...
 

Luukas.2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2023
Messages
441
Gender
Male
HSC
2023
I figured out what they wanted for 14(c)(i), the non-otherwise approach.

Take vectors OA and OB as having lengths A and B, respectively. Without loss of generality, assume that OA has the larger angle between itself and the x-axis than has OB.

Take OB' = b2i - b1j so (from the information given) it is perpendicular to OB and still has magnitude of B.

Let phi be the angle between OA and OB', so that cos(phi) = OA . OB' / AB = |a1b2 - a2b1| / AB.

The absolute value takes care of the problem if points A and B are not in quadrant 1, and for the change in sign if my assumption is wrong and so we need OA' rather than OB'.

Now, taking theta as the angle between OA and OB, the required area is

ABsin(theta) / 2 = ABcos(90 - theta) / 2 = ABcos(phi) / 2 = AB|a1b2 - a2b1| / 2AB = |a1b2 - a2b1| / 2

as required.

Like @epicmaths, I kept wanting to use the given information to get at a half times base times height approach, but it is actually giving us a complementary angle. :)
 

epicmaths

Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2023
Messages
43
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
I've updated my solutions on the YT also, similar hints based solution to Luukas for Q14. I like Mok's also.

The hint is awkward and I get too paranoid about cases to want to do that under exam conditions.
 

Attachments

Luukas.2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2023
Messages
441
Gender
Male
HSC
2023
I've updated my solutions on the YT also, similar hints based solution to Luukas for Q14. I like Mok's also.

The hint is awkward and I get too paranoid about cases to want to do that under exam conditions.
I agree that the hint is awkward. I like the way Mok has used it, although the existence of cases is not treated. I kept thinking of how the perpendicular vector gas the direction of the altitude and trying to adjust its magnitude to match the height of the triangle. I suspect it will have led many to think about A = bh / h, and consequently I wonder if it was really that helpful.
 

epicmaths

Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2023
Messages
43
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
The Armin and Tywebb version of 14ci is a work of art! I also tried doodling components and acting like I can prove pythagoras for a few minutes and gave up!
Mok's is probably what the writing committee intended - and boy that took projections to a whole new level, Luukas and I both missed what to really do with the perpendicular - I tried really hard to rescale it to the height also.
 

Luukas.2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2023
Messages
441
Gender
Male
HSC
2023
Some of their notation is wrong, like they should have arrows for vectors instead of lines.
And the start of the alternative solution should refer to the projection of OA onto OC, rather than of AC onto OC... though they do correct themselves further on.
 

Luukas.2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2023
Messages
441
Gender
Male
HSC
2023
Oh dear. I haven't had a close look at the rest of it. But if there are so many errors in just 1 question it makes me wonder what else is wrong with it. Heaven forbid if students actually lost marks due to errors in the mg.

Could we see it pulled like they did with Standard and Advanced?
Well, look on the bright side - at least we aren't Victoria!

Though there were mistakes in the HSC Chemistry exam. No one should have been disadvantaged by accepting what the exam said, but it does have clear errors. :(
 

epicmaths

Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2023
Messages
43
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
@tywebb do you mean pulled as in the question not considered in the marking? What was the precedent in standard and advanced?

The question is good and lends itself to quite a few different solutions. Perhaps only a small fraction of attempts will make actual progress...

Perhaps during pilot marking they end up deciding to award a whole mark for even the most trivial observation (eg p=0.95 in last year's sample proportion) just pad out the marks....Not ideal either.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top