The Abortion Debate (continued) (1 Viewer)

[katie tully]

steaks are delicious

i didnt see how they were referred to in here, but if a foetus tastes like steak then i'm all for recycling

 

[Kwayera]

cbf reading any of the responses, but 99% of you are fucking retarded and i have no idea how kway can continue to respond to the level of retardation in this thread

i bid ye farewell for tonight

I'm just a sucker for punishment

 

[katie tully]

I'm just a sucker for punishment

me too! :wave:

will take me all morning, but nobody should fight the good fight alone.

lolz murder~*~*keke

 

[Nebuchanezzar]

cbf reading any of the responses, but 99% of you are fucking retarded and i have no idea how kway can continue to respond to the level of retardation in this thread

i bid ye farewell for tonight

You're a bastion of intelligence and integrity.

 

[*o*]

just want to get an opinion on the way i view abortion. What is worse:

1. Having an unwanted child who can not be truly cared for due to lack of mental and financial preparedness. Ultimately resolving in an unhappy upbringing, and eventual life. How many of you know babies who have been born to unwanting teenaged families who are screwed up?

2. Aborting the child, and in essence depriving it of sentience.

Additionally, in these times of economic hardship do we really need any more welfare families draining the governments already stretched system?

So what do you think?

 

[katie tully]

You're a bastion of intelligence and integrity.

dont you forget it

 

[Nebuchanezzar]

can not be truly cared for due to lack of mental and financial preparedness. Ultimately resolving in an unhappy upbringing, and eventual life.

Can we stop with the sweeping generalisations from the pro-abortion camp please?

 

[katie tully]

Can we stop with the sweeping generalisations from the pro-abortion camp please?

Only if you twats stop with the whole 'lolz murder' thing.

 

[katie tully]

No apparently we don't, because an egg and a sperm have to meet and as soon as they meet it's baby time! So if you shoot a lazer at a sperm and kill it whilst it's 3nm away from the egg, it's ok coz they haven't fertilised yet.

Not murder

 

[Nebuchanezzar]

Only if you twats stop with the whole 'lolz murder' thing.

I would like to repeat for the thousandth time that I've not once called it murder. I've been calling it killing.

Thanks Katie.

 

[want2bdifferent]

just want to get an opinion on the way i view abortion. What is worse:

1. Having an unwanted child who can not be truly cared for due to lack of mental and financial preparedness. Ultimately resolving in an unhappy upbringing, and eventual life. How many of you know babies who have been born to unwanting teenaged families who are screwed up?

2. Aborting the child, and in essence depriving it of sentience.

Additionally, in these times of economic hardship do we really need any more welfare families draining the governments already stretched system?

So what do you think?

I think aborting the child in that situation is selfish.. there are thousand's of people who want children to adopt but are on ridulously long waiting lists, many who will never adopt.

out of your hard situation bring someone joy

 

[katie tully]

I would like to repeat for the thousandth time that I've not once called it murder. I've been calling it killing.

Thanks Katie.

Semantics.

 

[katie tully]

I think aborting the child in that situation is selfish.. there are thousand's of people who want children to adopt but are on ridulously long waiting lists, many who will never adopt.

out of your hard situation bring someone joy

Yeah and how many of these people are willing to adopt babies with severe medical conditions?

 

[want2bdifferent]

Yeah and how many of these people are willing to adopt babies with severe medical conditions?

I think that some would be willing

EDIT: and some have no choice cos they find out after the child is born

 

[Nebuchanezzar]

No apparently we don't, because an egg and a sperm have to meet and as soon as they meet it's baby time! So if you shoot a lazer at a sperm and kill it whilst it's 3nm away from the egg, it's ok coz they haven't fertilised yet.

i'm not sure what your objection is, and i'm not sure how you think you can get away with calling this distinction arbitrary when you yourself believe that abortions can take place up until around about 24 weeks when there exists some magical dividing line upon which time it becomes wrong.

 

[katie tully]

I think that some would be willing

EDIT: and some have no choice cos they find out after the child is born

Yes there are some that are willing. But are you actually implying that a large percentage of adoptive parents want to adopt a baby with a severe medical condition?

I highly doubt it.

 

[katie tully]

i'm not sure what your objection is, and i'm not sure how you think you can get away with calling this distinction arbitrary when you yourself believe that abortions can take place up until around about 24 weeks when there exists some magical dividing line upon which time it becomes wrong.

I've already covered my stance on this. I don't know how many times I have to explain to you the difference between a viable life and a non viable life.

 

[Nebuchanezzar]

Yeah and how many of these people are willing to adopt babies with severe medical conditions?

ahh. inconvinence is grounds for killing now. when does this stop exactly? :wave:

 

[katie tully]

ahh. inconvinence is grounds for killing now. when does this stop exactly? :wave:

Sure

 

[Nebuchanezzar]

I've already covered my stance on this. I don't know how many times I have to explain to you the difference between a viable life and a non viable life.

you haven't covered your stance at all because you don't understand the objection i'm raising. this post itself has a big fat fuzzy dividing line that you're going to have to justify. When is the concrete time at which it ends. Why is this so.