The big ugly AAS reliability/validity question (1 Viewer)

[F_W01]

I said invalid, but fairly reliable, the 0.64 was an outlier and should have been excluded (I think)

 

[mushroom_head]

would we lose marks if we didn't mention to discard the o.64?? otherwise i'm dead

 

[tennille]

I think its unreliable because when the tests were repeated, different results were obtained, making it unreliable. It was reliable for 1,2,3 and 5, but because 4 was completely different, it makes it unreliable.