cosmo kramer
Banned
ive got LOGICAL proofs to back this up
Last edited:
y u so vagueive got LOGICAL proofs to back this up
you should post on /new/shadows of nothing
it's a community site that ive been at for the past 8 years
it only has about 15 or so active members left
the housing crisis and recession was predicted by Austrian economists many years before it took place, banks were FORCED to give out those bad loans, and the market was distorted by the fed's artificially lowered interest rates, artificially created cheap credit fucks everybody over k? the banks had all this fucking money from the fed, in a time when the economy was booming its ass off, sif they were gonna be prudent lol, I wouldn't of expected them to be prudent. If the government policy was not put in place and the fed did not exist no bad loans would of been given out, because nobody would be A forcing them to and B the money to do it would not EXIST PERIOD.ahgahaha m8
ron paul 5eva
so you acknowledge that the dipping of interest rates and then the subsequent raising of them again was one of the main reasons for the crash, but then you seem to smack your head into dirt when it comes to acknowledging any of the other events that attributed to what happened?
if the lenders had practiced prudent lending practices then the increase in interest rates would not have had the same ramifications!?!?!?! fed responsible for the practices of private enterprise? m8, everything is simple with hindsight.
its not fraudulent, fed distorts the market with cheap credit, businesses get the wrong price signals and make bad investments, and everything fucks up when interest rates go up to curb the inflation created by the fed.you're essentially saying that the fed should expect that their monetary policy would lead to fraudulent practice. okay.
if A is the fed, than A should not exist in the first place to allow actions by B to happenseriously, i don't know what you're arguing. it's not economics:
when entity a) partakes in an action which entity b) abuses, a) attempts to rectify problem and the result of b)'s previous actions leads to serious ramifications. without entity b) abusing the situation in the first place a)'s attempts to rectify the problem would have had a negligible ill effect.
moot brought back /new/ and /r9k/ anywayoffspin of 4chan news board which got deleted because it was overrun by white supremacists and conspiracy theories about jews
you'd find lots to agree with there
http://4chon.net/new/
wrong price signals? i suggest you read the big short. loans were failing catasrophically before interest rates were risen. how does standard & poors rating junk grade bonds as AAA have anything to do with this? loaning to people leveraged at well over 100% based on the fact that house prices would never fall, bad price signalling?its not fraudulent, fed distorts the market with cheap credit, businesses get the wrong price signals and make bad investments, and everything fucks up when interest rates go up to curb the inflation created by the fed.
if A is the fed, than A should not exist in the first place to allow actions by B to happen
K NOW IM DONE