kingbigboyjames
Banned
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2009
- Messages
- 103
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2006
WTF did Johns do wrong? I dont give a fuck about this girl. This is fucked up at a colossal level.
I don't think four corners is the program you out your scandal on if you're looking to score a fortune.The chicks pretty much a money scoring slut
"omg i just remembered, MJ and his footy players and i had consensual sex, i'll
play the victim and we'll get like 500grands etc from the media"
fuckin slut
apparently if one is drunk, they are in no state of mind to give lawful consent for sex.So if anyone has sex with a drunk girl, that's rape?
Probably not partake in a gang bangThis is ridiculous. You can get CONSENT off a woman, and still be absolutely flamed in the media.
How is any man supposed to know what to do? Before you take a woman home you must register intent to engage in sexual intercourse at the police station.
Heh yeah, you'd think they'd be more sensible than that.Probably not partake in a gang bang
JUST A RECOMMENDATION FOR ANY FOOTBALL PLAYERS OUT THERE
I do not think that one has to find the group sex part of wrong to find the incident morally disgusting. The girl (even though she apparently consented) has obviously not enjoyed the aftermath, especially in regards to her state of mind forthwith. It is probable, therefore, that she did not (in the very least) enjoy the latter stages of the event (viz. when others joined in). Generally discomfort / dislike is very evidently manifest in a person's outward behaviour / body language / expression etc. To continue, therefore (in the case of the group of wankers, less so those actually having the sex), when some-one is obviously not only not enjoying something, but is actually in very severe discomfort, even though she consented, is not a particulalry nice thing to do; hence 'morally reprehensible'. In this case Johns personally would be less blackened (though IF he did those comments etc he has, essentially, joined with the wider group). I totally own that this is not necessarily the case (ie the discomfort speculation) but, in my view, seems the likeliest turn of events, which means that much of the affair could be labelled 'morally disgusting'.Why is it morally disgusting?
The negative attitude towards people who enjoy group sex is similar to the persecution of homosexuals. There is nothing harmful about it if all parties consent. People just find it objectionable because it is not 'normal.'
lolOh fucken. Now the footy show is gona be shit.
Fucked up, backward dating media culture:OKSo none of you actually believe mathew johns did anything wrongif you say consensual group sex is wrong, then you are worse than hitler.and you all must agree that he did nothing illegal.so what the fuck is he being dragged over the coals for, PLZ EXPLAIN
Media only gives the people what they want WHY ARE PEOPLE SO DUMBFucked up, backward dating media culture:
Nine news tonight- spent 8 minutes on this story (which has no relevance to the future of this country) and then went,
Oh, in other news...the budget bla bla
We did only have the federal budget released last night! (you'd think it would have some importance)