• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

The Offical Tennis thread (1 Viewer)

Sweets

objective subjectives
Joined
Aug 20, 2004
Messages
1,150
Location
Somewhere over the rainbow..
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
Rafy wins Barcelona defeating Ferrero in the final. As much as I was upset about Ferrero losing, I just can't be pissed with Nadal. He is so humble and he fights so much.

It was so funny after the match the Trophy for Barcelona is huge and Ferrero (having won it in 2001) was helping Nadal lift it up. It was such a funny pic, you could almost see a wry smile on Juan's face at the irony of the situation. Deffinetly one of the funniest presentation ceremonys. Although not as funny as when Marat's trophy fell apart.

I'm just glad Juan Carlos is back in finals where he should be.


And Elena what a freaking fighter. She loves Russia. She was down 3 match points and somehow she won 4-6 7-6 6-0, keeping Russia in their Fed Cup tie against Italy.
 

Sweets

objective subjectives
Joined
Aug 20, 2004
Messages
1,150
Location
Somewhere over the rainbow..
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
I think Nadal if he plays like he has been playing all season he would beat him in a 3 set match. At Roland Garros however where the matches are 5 sets and something which Rafa has never experienced before I would give the edge to Federer, as he is deffinetly one of those players who knows how to rise to a big ocassion.

I mean the guy has only lost twice this yr and having seen both the matches it takes a incredible level to beat him and even then the players are just beating him, as in both matches Fed has held match point(s). However I don't think his losing those matches is a 'choke', it just shows the high intensity these players are playing with.

Nadal plays with immense intensity though and he is so fired up and always pushing himself and his form on clay has been brilliant so I suppose thats why i'm going with him to a certain extent.
 

sarevok

Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2004
Messages
853
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2004
I think it depends on how easy Nadal's previous matches are. If you look at some of the five set matches he's played this year, against Hewitt and Federer he just ran out of steam in the final set. If he has to play four or five grueling matches against specialist clay-courters before meeting Federer, I would definitely give Federer the edge. If he wins them easily then I think he has a good chance (though I'd still tip Federer to win).
 

Benny_

Elementary Penguin
Joined
Oct 8, 2003
Messages
2,261
Location
Wollongong
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
Federer is very experienced at losing 5 setters if I recall correctly. I think based on current form, I'd give the edge to Nadal on clay.. Federer still doesn't seem to have fully mastered the surface like he has with every other surface. 1 masters trophy (Rome last year if I recall correctly) Nadal on the other hand obviously revels playing on clay. Rome masters soon, then French I think ! :D
 

sarevok

Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2004
Messages
853
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2004
Federer has had to withdraw from the Rome Masters due to a 'plantar fascitis' in both feet. Hopefully he'll be OK for the FO.
 

Sweets

objective subjectives
Joined
Aug 20, 2004
Messages
1,150
Location
Somewhere over the rainbow..
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
jim_green said:
Federer is very experienced at losing 5 setters if I recall correctly. I think based on current form, I'd give the edge to Nadal on clay.. Federer still doesn't seem to have fully mastered the surface like he has with every other surface. 1 masters trophy (Rome last year if I recall correctly) Nadal on the other hand obviously revels playing on clay. Rome masters soon, then French I think ! :D
I think the reason it seems he loses 5 setters alot is because he rarely plays them. Mentally though Federer is very strong now. He is 18-0 in finals.


OMG i hate TMS Rome. They denied Ferrero a Wild Card. He is a past champion at Rome and a freaking Former Roland Garros Champion and World no.1 and his ranking is high enough now, it's just that it wasn't when the enteries went in.

I hope their tournament fails! Gaaaah
 

jm1234567890

Premium Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2002
Messages
6,516
Location
Stanford, CA
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
Sweets said:
I think the reason it seems he loses 5 setters alot is because he rarely plays them. Mentally though Federer is very strong now. He is 18-0 in finals.


OMG i hate TMS Rome. They denied Ferrero a Wild Card. He is a past champion at Rome and a freaking Former Roland Garros Champion and World no.1 and his ranking is high enough now, it's just that it wasn't when the enteries went in.

I hope their tournament fails! Gaaaah
he can still be a qualifer can't he?
 

Benny_

Elementary Penguin
Joined
Oct 8, 2003
Messages
2,261
Location
Wollongong
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
The draw for Rome is out, Ferrero isn't playing. Top 4 seeds are Roddick, Safin, Moya and Agassi. I'm predicting a Nadal vs Nalbandian final.
 

mizz_smee

has a fetish 4 handcuffs
Joined
Jun 27, 2004
Messages
1,585
Location
central coast
Gender
Female
HSC
2004
i love this thread coz people actually no Nadal *drools*
GO NADAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

Benny_

Elementary Penguin
Joined
Oct 8, 2003
Messages
2,261
Location
Wollongong
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
Choose any of reasons A-C

A. He's not that good.
B. His biggest weapon, the serve, is nullified by clay.
C. There are plenty of good clay courters who'll make mincemeat of him.
 

sarevok

Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2004
Messages
853
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2004
'Cause he sucks on clay. He does well at Houston because none of the specialist claycourters play there but put him against any Spaniard or Argentine on European clay and they will beat him 90% of the time.
 

Sweets

objective subjectives
Joined
Aug 20, 2004
Messages
1,150
Location
Somewhere over the rainbow..
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
Roddick is just not commited to clay in my opinion. He plays in the US and wins against mediocre competition there when if he was really serious about a roland garros win he would go to Europe much earlier and be playing against the real European claycourters.

Americans are pretty pathetic when it comes to clay actually. Basically no American except Vince Spadea played Monte Carlo. Pathetic really esp when Monte Carlo comes as close to replicating the conditions in Paris then any other TMS or tournie.
 

Benny_

Elementary Penguin
Joined
Oct 8, 2003
Messages
2,261
Location
Wollongong
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
Nah, I think Roddick just wanted to get a run before competing in a clay court masters. He wouldn't have got enough match practice at Monte Carlo because someone like Chela would've owned him in the 2nd round.
 

Sweets

objective subjectives
Joined
Aug 20, 2004
Messages
1,150
Location
Somewhere over the rainbow..
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
He does it every year though and he has won that tournament in Houston many times now but always loses in the opening rounds of Roland Garros. Obviously its not working. I love Duckboy I just wish he wouldnt be so duckheaded.

What do you guys think of Lletyon Hewitt's comment that Wimby is only between him and Roger. Ahem Ivo Karlovic :rolleyes:
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top