Perhaps you're regardin European leagues too highly there...? Sure they are the cream of the crop in club football, but that is not to say that good players don't exist in other leagues. The majority of Korean, Iranian and Japanese players are from local or regional leagues, Park Ji-Sung was playin in Japan durin the last World Cup and he scored one fine goal against Italy.withoutaface said:Saudi Arabia have no players in their squad (to my knowledge) who would be good enough to play in any of the major European leagues, likewise with China, Bahrain and pretty much every Asian country you care to name apart from Japan, Korea and Iran. Now even if we do slip up against one of these and come fifth, we'd still have a relatively soft play off against CONCACAF, especially when compared to facing the 5th placed CONMENBOL country.
Underestimating the competitiveness of Asian football here are we...?DRAGONZ said:Why top three?
Asia have 4.5 spots now .. don't they?
Japan, South Korea, Iran, and Saudi Arabia all made it through to the World Cup. And Bahrain lost their qualifier to Trinidad and Tobago.
So that's 4.5.
Take the half-spot away, and that's four places for Asia.
Which *should* leave room for Australia, Japan, South Korea, and Iran/Saudi Arabia/China .. you would think.
lol yeh i think they took the finding of the next guus to a more literal level...LMF^^ said:Underestimating the competitiveness of Asian football here are we...?
Sure the traditional powerhouses are there, but with the introduction of the Socceroos I expect a real shake up in the confederation. But it all depends on whether Australia gets seeded in the next World Cup qualifying matches. If we aren't then we can be grouped together with any of the top teams, which will make things very interesting.
You would think that South Korea are a better team than Saudi Arabia, but they were beaten of the Saudis home and away in qualifying. I guess that's why they went through so many coaches, I think they were all Dutch too.
Yeah, that's correct. I'm not underestimating Asian football, though. I just think that if Australia can somehow maintain a similar level of quality after we lose Hiddink and a few players, then we will just be too strong for most of the countries in Asia overall.LMF^^ said:Underestimating the competitiveness of Asian football here are we...?
Sure the traditional powerhouses are there, but with the introduction of the Socceroos I expect a real shake up in the confederation. But it all depends on whether Australia gets seeded in the next World Cup qualifying matches. If we aren't then we can be grouped together with any of the top teams, which will make things very interesting.
I don't think we could top any group in Europe, and I reckon we'd be relying on a qualifier.mecurial said:On an unrelated note, if Australia was to play to a level at or above its World Cup 2006 performance (highly contentious at this point in time), would we be able to qualify in a European group? Obviously purely hypothetical, but...
Personally I would. We played a possession-based game, and our defenders would be more suited to slower, more physical European opponents.
DRAGONZ said:Yes .. of course, it would send a wonderful message to Japan, China, Korea, Iran, Saudi Arabia and all the other random Asian countries out there if Les Murray was to publicly say, "Australia will find it easier to qualify".
You have to show the opposition respect.
Anyway:
Japan = Reigning Asian Champions.
Australia 3 def. 1 Japan
Enough said.
England can just rely on Beckham freekicks to win it, easy. Apart from Buffon the rets of the keepers are 1 lvl below. Buffon for Keeper of the tournament.matt#1 said:Why does everyone in this forum have such a grudge against England?!? Sure, they have played some 'uninspiring' football so far...but that dosen't mean that Australia would be able finish above England in a qualifying group.
I agree that perhaps a side with so many superstar players (Rooney, Becks, Gerrard, Lampard, etc) should probably be playing alot better than the way they have been...but their ability to grind out narrow wins still makes them one of the top sides in the world. Just look at Chelsea for example...how many times have we seen them get away with a 1-0 win? Too many times for my liking. They get labelled as a 'boring' team for this...but it is their ability to grind out such results when they are not playing well that makes them such a class side. This consistency is also a major reason why they have won the last 2 premierships.
I would have liked to conclude this little rant by saying that I hope England wins the World Cup to shut you all up...but unfortunately for them they are up against Portugal. In the event that Portugal do happen to be beaten by England though...I hope that England goes on to win the World Cup.
They may not be top 5, but:- L1n - said:Is that suppose to be a good argument considering Japan 3 yrs ago is not Japan now, basing your theory it's like saying.
Greece = Reigning Europe Champions
Australia 1 def Greece 0
Greece = no show at world cup
Australia = world top 5.
your theory is flawed.
Why can't England just rely on Becks' free kicks? ...It has worked for them well so far .- L1n - said:England can just rely on Beckham freekicks to win it, easy. Apart from Buffon the rets of the keepers are 1 lvl below. Buffon for Keeper of the tournament.
Nah, Switzerland didn't even concede a game time goal.matt#1 said:Maybe I am just being biased again...but how good has the form of Portuguese 'keeper Ricardo been? He has let in only 1 goal so far (equal best in the tournament)
What I meant to say was that Portugal has let in the equal least amount of goals of any team remaining in the tournament.LMF^^ said:Nah, Switzerland didn't even concede a game time goal.