In both my sources for the vernon anchors, it mentions that the electrode potential of aluminium is relevant, "A display and mounting system was built for the anchors which includes an aluminium mesh on
which the anchors rest. Mesh rather than solid metal allows water to drain away and aluminium was
chosen because of its electrode potential relative to the iron in the anchors."
Can someone please explain how this is relevant? The way I figure it is it's trying to say it's more reactive and as such if will rust before the iron, so that's why it was chosen, which makes sense, except that aluminium passivates. For those who don't know, the anchors are displayed outside on a block of wood, NEAR the sea but not in it. The fact that the Cl- ions could interrupt the passivating layer occurs to me... but is this really the reason?
Anyway, any clarification is appreciated, thanks
which the anchors rest. Mesh rather than solid metal allows water to drain away and aluminium was
chosen because of its electrode potential relative to the iron in the anchors."
Can someone please explain how this is relevant? The way I figure it is it's trying to say it's more reactive and as such if will rust before the iron, so that's why it was chosen, which makes sense, except that aluminium passivates. For those who don't know, the anchors are displayed outside on a block of wood, NEAR the sea but not in it. The fact that the Cl- ions could interrupt the passivating layer occurs to me... but is this really the reason?
Anyway, any clarification is appreciated, thanks
Last edited: