Lol, so you believe that through Hamas' actions, 5.3 million people are effectively sentenced to death, including women, children and infants. Let me ask you this retard, do you think that the famine in Gaza is a consequence of Hamas or the fact that the Israeli occupation is systematically starving these people, or are you one of those people that reject the famine altogether?
		
		
	 
I personally don't reject the famine completely. But if you are Hamas, they effectively starting a fight that they had no chance of winning. Hamas is 100% winning on the PR front (they have won over the UN and its sympathizers) but is horribly losing the war on a practical level. The war could have ended a lot earlier if Hamas surrendered and returned all the hostages. But they won't and haven't. The issue of the famine is partially the fault of the UN agencies failure in the aid pipelines and the fact that Hamas has been seizing the aid.
	
		
	
	
		
		
			A ceasefire is not necessarily the end of a war. There was also a ceasefire and hostage swap in January, which amounted to nothing. I think most people would at least want a peace treaty signed before we can say definitively that the war is over (and even then, the war could flare up again). Also, even if the bombing stops, there is still a blockade on Gaza, Israeli settlers undermining a two-state solution, and a general lack of sovereignty for Palestinians, among other reasons, for there to be protests about the current state of Palestine.
		
		
	 
If you are referring to the naval blockade that was pre-existing and was recognized as legitimate in one report (the infamous Palmer report) but again that is also contested information. 
TBH, a two state solution won't appease radicals on either side that want the other side eradicated.
I do not agree with the provocative settlements, that just adds fuel to the fire.
	
		
	
	
		
		
			Doesn't count as a genocide, if it's against the colonizers.
		
		
	 
Ignorance.
	
		
	
	
		
		
			This is coloniser logic that has been used (most recently by 12 year olds on the internet) to justify imperialism and colonialism. It is NOT a justifiable reason, try applying it to WW2 or pretty much all of Australia's history with Indigenous Australians and it starts looking REALLY bad.
		
		
	 
Pot calling the kettle black. People throwing around terms like "colonizer" but are ignorant of history or meaning. It is also fallacious to compare Australia's history with the Middle East.
What I mean throwing around words like "colonization" are typically gross oversimplifications. I hope people realize not every conflict is two sides, one of colonization versus resistance by a indigenous people. That is a really bad liberal Western import onto a situation that is grossly ignorant of the history behind this conflict, that presumes one side is wrong and the other side of right when the truth is far more complex.
Did you know that Jews have historical and spiritual ties to the land too (so they can claim they are the indigenous people)?
Religion especially radical variants of Islam, plays a huge part in this conflict as well, since some sects view it is as Islamic territory ever since it was conquered in the 6th/7th century. One side argues that it is repatriation of indigenous people expelled from a homeland and the other side argues exactly what you are stating.
The people to add to the blame for the modern situation are the British and the Ottoman Empire (Turkish) before them. Mandatory Palestine was a British territory, not an independent state, the modern state of Israel is its closest successor. And the name Palestine was in response to a Jewish revolt in 136AD, most of the Arab migration occurred during the Islamic conquests of the 6th century and then further in the 1700s.
 
The modern concept of a Palestinian identity (just do your research on Yasser Arafat) is relative newish thing (maybe since the late 80s), noting that prior to that West Bank was part of Jordan and Gaza part of Egypt. Arab states attacked Israel in 1967 and surprisingly lost which is why Israel administers (or occupies, depending on your slant) those areas; although it withdrew from Gaza and let the Palestinians self-rule in 2005. 
The point I'm making is people blindly parrot phrases and put their support behind one side without actually doing the proper fact checking of history. It is messy and imho in this current conflict, both sides have a bit to answer for. Politics, especially around Israel, is messy.