Originally posted by narrator
you're probably right, but i just couldn't resist arguing with ssj_goku, he needs to wake up and accept the fact that + isn't a word, but 'and' is.
btw, goku, you complained over the precious seconds that you save by wriing +s, the point of contracting titles is exactly the same except it's designed with fairness in mind, beleive it or not titles do vary a great deal at times:
for example: emma v. An Imaginary Life
clueless v balde runner-director's cut
all of these are from advanced module A of this years HSC and although even when you shorten them they're not exactly the same (ie. 1 letter to 3 or 4), they're a lot closer
here's one from standard module C:
tracks v. the hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy
Btw, I do also believe that this is prob a pointless argument, but what the hey. Once again you flew right over my main point. My main point is that if contractions are used "to promote fairness", then several things would occur.
1. It would be officially endorsed and recommended by the BOS. The lack of encouragement demonstrates that contractions are simply something they let you get away with, not something that promotes fairness. Besides, as pomo states fairness is in the eye of the beholder, and mroe time writing the title might give someone more time to think about their response, who knows! ( again not being completely serious on the pomo point).
2. It would make sense. Even if you don't do maths narrator, you really should learn to count. Using the contractions most often tips the scales in the other direction, not the other way round (e.g. BR and clueless). Plus, most of the time people have an even distribution of long and short text titles.
3. This level of debate as to wether or not it was acceptable would not occur. While this does follow from part 1, there is also the notion that most of this insecurity comes from other fear, or guilt. If it were officially acceptable or widely considered to have a completely pure/altruistic reason for being, there would be less insecurity and less debate (although people such as you and me would still probably argue over it).
Finally, stop telling me to chill off. I've shown (through all the pomo references) that I'm continuing these debates for fun, whereas you're stalking of my posts seems to indicate that you have some sort of vendetta. Just remember, breathe in, breathe out.