Validity of this argument (1 Viewer)

[psyc1011]

Two days ago, I was told the following is not valid:

Argument 1 {
Premise 1: psyc1011's vibe is ________
Conclusion 1: psyc1011 is a female
}

Argument 2 {
Premise 2A: vibe has no judgement
Premise 2B: Argument 1
Conclusion 2: contradiction
}

This is me dissecting what another user said or puting their words into argument-form. Call this person Z.

My goal was to highlight a contradiction: Z said vibe has no judgement but as you can see from argument 1, he judged my gender from my 'vibes' - this implies that vibes have judgement and so contradiction?

Please, anyone. This has buggest me for the past days.

 

[InteGrand]

Two days ago, I was told the following is not valid:

Argument 1 {
Premise 1: psyc1011's vibe is ________
Conclusion 1: psyc1011 is a female
}

Argument 2 {
Premise 2A: vibe has no judgement
Premise 2B: Argument 1
Conclusion 2: contradiction
}

This is me dissecting what another user said or puting their words into argument-form. Call this person Z.

My goal was to highlight a contradiction: Z said vibe has no judgement but as you can see from argument 1, he judged my gender from my 'vibes' - this implies that vibes have judgement and so contradiction?

Please, anyone. This has buggest me for the past days.

What does it mean ''vibe has no judgement''?

 

[psyc1011]

What does it mean ''vibe has no judgement''?

I interpreted it as: from the vibes a person produces, judgements cannot be made

 

[psyc1011]

Here is the exchange -

PSYC1011 - talking about guy clothes and recommendations

Z - "arent u a girl" (paraphrased)

PSYC1011 - "no, how did u arrive at that conclusion?"

Z - "vibe"

PSYC1011 - "pls elaborate, what kind of vibe?"

Z - "it's the vibe... of the thing
i thought you were a white chick "

PSYC1011 - "k. lol
is the vibe good or bad for a male?"

Z - "vibe has no judgement
it's just... the vibe
hence the vibe"

 

[InteGrand]

Here is the exchange -

PSYC1011 - talking about guy clothes and recommendations

Z - "arent u a girl" (paraphrased)

PSYC1011 - "no, how did u arrive at that conclusion?"

Z - "vibe"

PSYC1011 - "pls elaborate, what kind of vibe?"

Z - "it's the vibe... of the thing
i thought you were a white chick "

PSYC1011 - "k. lol
is the vibe good or bad for a male?"

Z - "vibe has no judgement
it's just... the vibe
hence the vibe"

Hard to say due to shifty grammar etc., but I think "vibe has no judgement" was referring to that vibe being neither good nor bad, or something? I don't think it was referring to the statement that one can't judge something via vibes.

 

[psyc1011]

Hard to say due to shifty grammar etc., but I think "vibe has no judgement" was referring to that vibe being neither good nor bad, or something? I don't think it was referring to the statement that one can't judge something via vibes.

Ok, yes. It's making sense now.

Thanks, man!

 

[Flop21]

Can I ask what this is? Are you trying to analyse a casual conversation that actually happened?

 

[psyc1011]

Can I ask what this is? Are you trying to analyse a casual conversation that actually happened?

Yes, this happened in the confessions thread and yes, I'm analysing a casual convo

 

[Flop21]

Yes, this happened in the confessions thread and yes, I'm analysing a casual convo

Oh right. Well if it means anything, I always assumed you were male.

 

[psyc1011]

Oh right. Well if it means anything, I always assumed you were male.

Fair

 

[sy37]

Two days ago, I was told the following is not valid:

Argument 1 {
Premise 1: psyc1011's vibe is ________
Conclusion 1: psyc1011 is a female
}

Argument 2 {
Premise 2A: vibe has no judgement
Premise 2B: Argument 1
Conclusion 2: contradiction
}

This is me dissecting what another user said or puting their words into argument-form. Call this person Z.

My goal was to highlight a contradiction: Z said vibe has no judgement but as you can see from argument 1, he judged my gender from my 'vibes' - this implies that vibes have judgement and so contradiction?

Please, anyone. This has buggest me for the past days.

This..really isn't an argument. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy_of_the_undistributed_middle is the closest I can get from trying to understand what you mean

 

[Shadowdude]

Here is the exchange -

PSYC1011 - talking about guy clothes and recommendations

Z - "arent u a girl" (paraphrased)

PSYC1011 - "no, how did u arrive at that conclusion?"

Z - "vibe"

PSYC1011 - "pls elaborate, what kind of vibe?"

Z - "it's the vibe... of the thing
i thought you were a white chick "

PSYC1011 - "k. lol
is the vibe good or bad for a male?"

Z - "vibe has no judgement
it's just... the vibe
hence the vibe"

alternatively, you could've just asked this Z person "what does that even mean" in private or something


I think this Z person - whoever he or she is, I think they're super outstanding just by that awesome name - meant "vibe is neither good nor bad - vibes are neutral"

 

[psyc1011]

This..really isn't an argument. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy_of_the_undistributed_middle is the closest I can get from trying to understand what you mean

I don't know what you're on about but I think the form of my argument is wrong. Contradication shouldn't be a conclusion

alternatively, you could've just asked this Z person "what does that even mean" in private or something


I think this Z person - whoever he or she is, I think they're super outstanding just by that awesome name - meant "vibe is neither good nor bad - vibes are neutral"

I didn't ask you because I thought I interpreted it correctly but thanks for reaching out to me