red-butterfly
Member
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2008
- Messages
- 349
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2009
It was ok
just wished i wrote more for my essay
just wished i wrote more for my essay
I wrote 2 booklets (8 pages) for the report and 2.5 booklets for the essay (10 pages).i got 1.35 too
how much did people write for the business report?
thought the question was too specific to write alot about
especially the one on enviroment friendly products
1.35:1 is another way of expressing 135%WTF i got a percentage for that thingo that everyone got 1.35:1 for !!!!
I'm hoping I get 95-100. I can't see any questions which I've gotten wrong so far, so I think my essay and report will determine my mark, but I don't want to jinx myself.hopefully 90's but prob. i know i got atleast 2 mutiple choice wrong and one short answer , so about 82-85.
what about you guys ?
AgreedPromise you that any question asks for gearing ratio its total debt over total equity. I got 134.7%, or 135%. That's the answer, which was slightly over double the industry average meaning its highly geared and in a dangerous position with regards to debt repayments. if the industry average is in percentage, you should always you percentage, rather than 1.35:1, not saying thats wrong tho.
+1Promise you that any question asks for gearing ratio its total debt over total equity. I got 134.7%, or 135%. That's the answer, which was slightly over double the industry average meaning its highly geared and in a dangerous position with regards to debt repayments. if the industry average is in percentage, you should always you percentage, rather than 1.35:1, not saying thats wrong tho.
I had a lot of time on my hands, so I went through each method of expansion, discussed each one in a seperate paragraph, followed by a paragraph linked to my case study. Then I defined the influences briefly and how each method of expansion (if applicable to that objective) assisted in achieving that objective and in between each I linked it with my case studyhey how did everyone do the last essay question??? its the one about analysing expansion methods and their influence on financial objectives. i didn't know how to break it down and present a logical structure coz there r 5 methods and 5 objectives, right? so it seemed tediously long to do all 5 objectives for each method! so did anyone do dat or u just do one or two objectives for each method????????
cheers
I had a lot of time on my hands, so I went through each method of expansion, discussed each one in a seperate paragraph, followed by a paragraph linked to my case study. Then I defined the influences briefly and how each method of expansion (if applicable to that objective) assisted in achieving that objective and in between each I linked it with my case study
I don't understand. I think the syllabus is very clear on what they want. I quote:Leading edge both mentions debt to equity ratio and asset to debt ratio.
I think syllabus dot point is little bit confusing by the using the word "Gearing". My teacher who has been the HSC Executive marker also mentioned that it is little bit confusing that they did that. He reckons debt to equity ratio is more correct one according to Syllabus. I am not too sure, but surely, you should be able to back up ur response. After all, this is in-school exam. ^_^