What is an E4 ... its 90+ isnt it? (1 Viewer)

[emmatheron]

I realised how easy it should be to get above 80 in MX2.... seing as over 90% of candidates recieve ithttp://www.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/ebos/static/BDHSC_2008_12_15260.php

 

[Uncle]

Marks are out of 50 not 100 in 1 unit extension courses.

 

[emmatheron]

not if u MX2... then its out of 100

 

[ajdlinux]

A band E3 is actually 70-89, not 80-89. The median and mean marks in Extension 2 last year were both around 82-83, I think (according to the UAC scaling report). So 50% of students got well into the 80s and 90s.

 

[ajdlinux]

Marks are out of 50 not 100 in 1 unit extension courses.

MX2 is a 2-unit extension course, and it's reported out of 100.

 

[emmatheron]

wait so 90-100=E4, 70-89=E3.... thats not linear?!and E2=? and E1=?

 

[emmatheron]

well anybody answer my previous post
^
|
|
|
|
|

 

[youngminii]

A band E3 is actually 70-89, not 80-89. The median and mean marks in Extension 2 last year were both around 82-83, I think (according to the UAC scaling report). So 50% of students got well into the 80s and 90s.

What the f*ck
Band E3 is 80-89

 

[zeleboy]

E3 is 75-89.

 

[Top Secret]

E3 is 75-89.

No, it's 70-89.

 

[emmatheron]

someone tell me every perfomance band from E1-E4 please with evidence

 

[thisnameistaken]

E4 = 45- 50/50
E3 = 35-44/50
E2=25-34/50
E1= Epic fail

.... i think

 

[arman]

gay. i got 24 in trial. so thats E1

 

[qwertyasd]

E4 = 45-50
e3 = 35-44
e2 = 20-34
e1 = 0-19

 

[ajdlinux]

gay. i got 24 in trial. so thats E1

You'd be hoping that the mark alignment process would get you into the E2 range. In some Extension exams, getting as low as 20% has been enough to align up to E2.