Eviltama:
Someone use the dictionary n look up the meaning of poor.
"
poor -
adjective. 1 - having little or nothing in they way of wealth, goods, or means of subsistence."
-
The Macquarie Dictionary
How is High poor? Good question.
Without much other resources, I've cited two articles: High's Annual Report 2001 and Bossley Park Public School's (my sister's school) Annual Report 2002. Now before you tell me wtf are you doing Frigid - you comparing a high school to a primary school - let me say, one
expects a high school to have more income, more expenditure and finally, a bigger balance carried forward. Now I'll let some numbers do the talking:
Income:
Balance Brought Foward: (SBHS) $137.2K ; (BPPS) $218.7K
Total Income for year: (SBHS) $1.9M ; (BPPS) $618.8K
Expenditure:
Total Expenditure: (SBHS) $1.8M; (BPPS) $398.6K
Balance Carried Forward:: (SBHS) $190K ; (BPPS) $ 220.3K
As it is clearly shown, in both the start and the end of the year, my sister's school, my sister's normal public primary school, managed to have more funds than High. Are we not poor, when we have less money, obviously, than my sister's school? And this is not counting the fact that our school is normally compared with the private boys' schools of the GPS, whose budgets extend to the tens of millions. Therefore, in their eyes, or even in the eyes of a humble local public school, our budget is one of paltriness. I again hope you do not disagree.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How come, eviltama, you do not dare to quote the larger lengths of my post? Do you fear that by extending your quote, some truth might leak out? Are you afraid that I have already answered your pathetic rebuttals, as fully and aptly as I can? Do you realise that you yourself, although you say you want this thread closed, are preventing its closure by your continual remarks to salvage whatever is left of your face? Are you aware that all of your arguments in regards to us, the High boys, have been lacking in substance and wanting in style? Why is it, I ask, that I answer all of your retorts soundly and with evidence, yet you cannot answer mine?
After I made that last comment ("I hope we will not continue to argue that"), why
must you to continue to spite me, when anyone of us has done you no wrong? Why
must you intrude into another's debate? Why!?! Your argument, to me, so far, has consisted of poor assumptions and a few "moronic" insults. Yet you cannot, as I can, back your argument up with solid evidence. See - I
am giving you something other than "mud slinging". What say you?
Nothing. Nothing that is solid as the evidence I've collected: no first hand experiences, no facts against mine. You cannot hope, in all the world, to win by your petty pot-shots. Neither did I aim to insult you, nor harm you, but you deliberately aimed it at me. Neither did I specifically insult another school, nor did I target individuals, but you deliberately targeted me.
Even if I did not have the numbers in this thread,
you know I have the undeniable evidence.
et tu? nihil.
I rest my case.
May the good gentlemen of the bench choose the victor wisely.