Originally posted by deviation
Why the balance must equal zero. The BOP covers all trade in goods, services, and financial assets between nationals and foreigners over a given period, say, a year. By construction, the balance always sums to zero. In part, this is pure convention: it results from the practice of double-entry bookkeeping. Everything enters twice in the accounting, once as a positive item and another time as a negative item. But there is also some logic behind the zero-sum of the BOP. The logic relates to the fact that the BOP records not only the trade in goods, services, and interest-bearing financial assets, but also trades of home and foreign money. When trade of a non-money good for money takes place between nationals and foreigners, there are necessarily some associated changes in holdings of foreign money at home or home money abroad. The BOP takes into account all those changes in money holdings as well as the trade in goods. It is this simultaneous consideration of the sale or purchase of goods and the associated movement of money holdings that results in the zero balance
your theory is quashed when there is a trade surplus...Originally posted by Aj10001
Surplus on Capital Account + Deficit on Current Account = 0
This is because any increase in the trade deficit must be countered by an increase in borrowings to pay for the deficit. Eg australia's trade deficit is $42 (which is shown as negative), it must borrow $42 (which is shown as positive) to pay for the trade debt.
The BOP == 0 under a floating exchange rate. You don't need to know why. Just accept it if you don't want to get confused.Originally posted by Lainee
LOL, you know what? I thought I understood this all pretty well until I read this and got all confused.
I read shannonm's post and I was like - yeah, I get that. And then I read Bambul's and was like - so, shannonm's one is right but I can't write that in an exam but must write about some floating exchange rate thingy which only works in some instances. And then I read Aj10001's and I was like - okay, that's understandable. And then.... argh! *facepalms*
Can someone summarise all this into one all-round answer please?
Really. Why not?Originally posted by AGB
thats not necessarily true...
Can you explain what you mean by Supply and Demand for $A and why they have to be equal? I'm sorry, I'm particularly dense today, perhaps you should spell it out for me.Originally posted by AGB
Here is the theory on why the BOP always = 0
Supply of $A
Payments for imports (M)
Income/transfer debits (Y debits)
Capital and financial outflow (K outflow)
Demand for $A
Receipts for exports (X)
Income/transfer credits (Y credits)
Capital and financial inflow (K inflow)
Supply of $A = Demand for $A
M + Y debits + K outflow = X + Y debits + K inflow
M X + Y debits Y credits = K inflow K outflow (rearranged equation)
Balance on Current account = Balance on Capital and Financial account
hope this clears it up for you Lainee
the factors that influence the demand for AUDs are the demand for exports and capital inflow, whereas the supply for AUDs is determined by the demand for imports and capital outflowOriginally posted by Lainee
But why do Payments for imports (M), Income/transfer debits (Y debits)and Capital and financial outflow (K outflow) make up the supply of $A? And the others the Demand for $A?