sam04u
Comrades, Comrades!
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2003
- Messages
- 2,867
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2006
1) Australia's recent economic success is due to our trade with China.
2) China is our biggest trade partner.
3) China is a regional superpower in Asia which is within proximity to Australia.
4) China resides over the worlds fastest growing economy.
Basically, Australia's best friend should be China. Yet - that really isn't the case all that often. Infact Rudd had the audacity to criticise China on Tibet, whilst in the same week celebrating Israel's 60th anniversary without making any references to their abbysmal human rights record.
So looking solely at Australian foreign affairs, who do we act as though is our closest ally? As always it's the United States of America.
I honestly don't understand this. In the first time in a while (with a Chinese speaking Australian Prime Minister and a rapidly growing China) Australia has an opportunity to become closer with our Asian neighbours, in particular China, Indonesia and Japan. But what are we doing? The same old thing we've always done - we stick to helping the United States of America.
Stephen Smith/Rudd's foreign policy of late has not been an effort to unify an Australian/Asian "community", but rather is focused on creating an Australian/Wider Pacific "community", what this means is we're trying to find more venues such as AIPAC to bring the United States closer to China. In effect revitalising the efforts of the past to increase America's influence on our door steps, and in turn diminish China's influence.
But why? What can we possibly have to gain from this? Nothing at all. China has alot more to offer Australia, therefore it's in our best interests to work more closely with China and expand it's area of influence, not the U.S.
Basically what our foreign affairs department is doing is trying to bring China and America together in order to isolate Russia. The problem is they don't get that it will not work. Russia =/= Soviet Union. China no longer has to take orders from us. Infact China has made it so clear that they're working with Russia this time around.
See: Shanghai Co-operation Organisation.
We either turn around and work more closely with China, or we're going to be pushed off into the sidelines and lose more and more regional relevance. We can't keep inviting our retarded friend America to the party.
2) China is our biggest trade partner.
3) China is a regional superpower in Asia which is within proximity to Australia.
4) China resides over the worlds fastest growing economy.
Basically, Australia's best friend should be China. Yet - that really isn't the case all that often. Infact Rudd had the audacity to criticise China on Tibet, whilst in the same week celebrating Israel's 60th anniversary without making any references to their abbysmal human rights record.
So looking solely at Australian foreign affairs, who do we act as though is our closest ally? As always it's the United States of America.
I honestly don't understand this. In the first time in a while (with a Chinese speaking Australian Prime Minister and a rapidly growing China) Australia has an opportunity to become closer with our Asian neighbours, in particular China, Indonesia and Japan. But what are we doing? The same old thing we've always done - we stick to helping the United States of America.
Stephen Smith/Rudd's foreign policy of late has not been an effort to unify an Australian/Asian "community", but rather is focused on creating an Australian/Wider Pacific "community", what this means is we're trying to find more venues such as AIPAC to bring the United States closer to China. In effect revitalising the efforts of the past to increase America's influence on our door steps, and in turn diminish China's influence.
But why? What can we possibly have to gain from this? Nothing at all. China has alot more to offer Australia, therefore it's in our best interests to work more closely with China and expand it's area of influence, not the U.S.
Basically what our foreign affairs department is doing is trying to bring China and America together in order to isolate Russia. The problem is they don't get that it will not work. Russia =/= Soviet Union. China no longer has to take orders from us. Infact China has made it so clear that they're working with Russia this time around.
See: Shanghai Co-operation Organisation.
We either turn around and work more closely with China, or we're going to be pushed off into the sidelines and lose more and more regional relevance. We can't keep inviting our retarded friend America to the party.
Jitters as China hit by metals fatigue
http://business.smh.com.au/business/jitters-as-china-hit-by-metals-fatigue-20081009-4xn9.html
AUSTRALIA'S best shield from global economic turmoil - the high value of its commodity exports - is under threat with news that China has told suppliers to slow iron ore shipments and predictions that iron ore and coal prices could fall by 20 per cent next year.
Australia's fifth-largest iron ore exporter, Mount Gibson Iron, shocked the sharemarket yesterday by warning that its Chinese customers were asking it to delay shipments as demand slowed due to economic uncertainty and the tightening of credit facilities.
This announcement came hours before Kevin Rudd said he had received reassurance from the Chinese Premier, Wen Jiabao, on Monday that China's growth forecasts remained strong.
He said he felt comforted by China's central bank cutting its interest rates by 0.27 percentage points to 6.93 per cent. "It would appear to me to be confirming that China intends long term to accelerate its growth strategy into the future," Mr Rudd said.
The rapid spread of the global financial crisis has led experts to reverse their expectations of another rise in bulk commodity prices. A 20 per cent fall in the price of iron ore and coal - now a serious prospect - could lower Australia's annual export earnings by $20 billion and wipe out billions in taxes from the surplus.
"It would have major repercussions," said ABN Amro's chief economist, Kieran Davies.
"It's certainly quite worrying," said ANZ's head of commodities research, Mark Pervan, who predicted the iron ore price would fall 20 per cent next year. "This is one of the clearest signs that the iron ore market is really starting to slow."
Larger iron producers such as BHP Billiton, Rio Tinto and Andrew Forrest's Fortescue Metals said their customers had not asked them to delay or cancel shipments. And Mount Gibson said its customers were obliged to take the ore because of their binding, long-term sales agreements.
BHP, Rio and Fortescue sell most of their ore to the 10 largest steel producers in China, while smaller miners such as Mount Gibson tend to sell to smaller mills that are more vulnerable in turbulent economic times.
Fortescue's executive director, Graeme Rowley, said Chinese customers were starting to become more selective, particularly when it came to purchasing from smaller miners.
But there are worrying signs that all iron ore miners will face a price cut next year. The daily spot price, which at one point this year was more than double the one-year contract price, is now trading in line with the contract price