WOW hard test! (1 Viewer)

[sara_lara_tara]

OMG WHO FOUND THAT HARD!!!...far out. the short answers were so ambiguous and stupid =o( and ahhhhhhhhhhh multiple choice hard!

 

[~*HSC 4 life*~]

MCQ was challenging

i loved everything else!!

except for mark allocation..that was a bitch!, two 5 markers in HR! and one 12 marker! farkin! but toherwise it wa sok

 

[ar5ena1]

MC was a bitch, even more ambigous then previous years.

 

[Evansy]

well gues what i knwo i failed, i totally fuck it up by my lack of being ready for it, lession for all new comers who do legal study and go to class! unlike me!

 

[lildr3am3r]

daymn absolutely agreed with the the mark allocations.. it sucked big time.. it's like SORRY NO CHANCE TO SCREW UP Arrrggh

the 12 marks allocated ofr crime was like ..o.0 .. omg?

there have been lack of questions n very specific type of questions.. is this a sign of l/s board lazy too lazy to mark or wat? hahahahhaa

the exam was challenging but it was a good exam i reckon.. it was diff

 

[vanbanned]

Don't worry, remember that everyone in the state probably went shit too.

 

[wallid]

our trial extended responses where on alternative family arrangements and scope for achieving world order, almost exact same

lucky us

weird test...... no HR in short answer , never seen dat b4

first time they really mad extended response specific as well

 

[vanbanned]

you still should have talked about other issues. While one of the family one's said "including dissolution of marriage" I also talked about a few other issues.

 

[Tenille]

thought it was ok the second short answer in section one was silly. world order and indigenous were good though

 

[pHaTso]

M/C was a bit weird...

the short answer section was stupid... i wish it focused a more on HR.

Crime was ok...

i really liked my option topics

GB

 

[sped_kid01]

i thought the essay q's were REALLY good (family n global environments)..i couldnt really complain....id done hardly any study, and could answer everything, just lucky i guess....plus i have a smary fried who sent me notes

 

[LadyBec]

the essys rocked my socks
But i don't think i did as well as i wanted to in crime and there were 2 or 3 M/C questions i didn't know....but it wasn't that bad.

 

[beccaxx]

glad it is over --- essays wer good, short answer sucked and crime 12 mark sucked.
balances out

 

[-Recoil-]

Yeah I'd been nailing the crime sections up until this one, I'll probably only score like 17-20, all depends on the marker I suppose, who really knows how they do it. Really different shit, plus I left it til last since I'd studied hard for my option topics.

 

[digmahstigma]

i agree with beccax

one of the family qs and one of the world order qs were the same as trial/previous assessment

that shouldve been good, too bad i didnt do well in them

 

[Lhyviathan]

i thought the essay q's were REALLY good (family n global environments)..i couldnt really complain....id done hardly any study, and could answer everything, just lucky i guess....plus i have a smary fried who sent me notes

Family and Global Environment... are you from Baulko, by any chance?

 

[SKA]

i think the multiple choice and short answers were a bitch.. everything else was fine