• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

Wtf is Personalities, Events & Situations? (1 Viewer)

Validity

Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2011
Messages
184
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2012
Could someone give me an an example for each from Caesar(preferably) or some other text?
 

aphorae

Member
Joined
May 9, 2011
Messages
534
Gender
Female
HSC
2011
Uni Grad
2017
You could interpret or discuss it as:

Personalities: Characters. Perspectives on a particular character, perspectives on that character's opinions, background, etc. Perhaps he/she is portrayed in a negative light by one person, but in a positive light by another.

Events: Literally, events. People see the same thing differently, which is why we have multiple witnesses on the same event, as arguably no witness is truly reliable. People are influenced to a degree by factors such as shock, emotions, personal agenda, the fallibility of memory and so on.

Situations: This can be more broad and be applied to almost anything. A character could be in a relationship - what does he/she do? What does the partner do? Do they view or treat the 'situation' differently? Why? A character could be a teacher reprimanding a student for bullying another - what kind of approach does he/she take, is it different from another teacher's, do other people approve or disapprove, and what factors motivate that teacher to take that approach?


I didn't do Caesar but let's just say in simple terms for Ted Hughes' poems:

Personalities: Depicts Plath in a negative light, portrays himself as helpless to do anything, casts himself as the victim and Plath as the perpetrator.

Events: In one of the poems, he discussed an event that occurred that directly paralleled and differed from the perspective that Plath gave in one of her other poems - motivated by personal agenda, as he basically passes the blame on to Plath. In another event, he portrays Plath's loss of temper as unreasonable and violent, and dismisses her - a clearly biased perspective.

Situations: Hughes implied that the relationship was doomed from the start, and that he was helpless in any given situation, instead saying that Plath was responsible for her own demise.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top