• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

ZOMG childporn In a Game! (1 Viewer)

Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
4,741
Location
sarajevo
Gender
Female
HSC
2015
Uni Grad
2017
In 2008, a Sydney man was convicted of possessing child pornography over a cartoon showing characters from The Simpsons engaged in sexual acts.
fucking
 

SnowFox

Premium Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2009
Messages
5,455
Location
gone
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2009
Best not be checking googles search engine then mr magistrate sir.
 

cosmo kramer

Banned
Joined
Apr 29, 2010
Messages
2,582
Location
Forever UNSW
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2006
is it child porn really if the women look like they're 24 years old like the DOA chicks do

like on soap operas and teen dramas all the teenage characters are played by 29 year olds
 

SnowFox

Premium Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2009
Messages
5,455
Location
gone
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2009
it isnt porn.

They aint fucking.
They aint naked.
All you see is some knickers and superboobs.

Seen worse (will see worse) in Duke Nukem games.
 

Selador

Premium Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
207
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
it isnt porn.

They aint fucking.
They aint naked.
All you see is some knickers and superboobs.

Seen worse (will see worse) in Duke Nukem games.
If you read the definition in the Act it's clear why this and the simpsons porn is covered. Both a sexual pose and a representation of an underage person.

Note too that under our law images may still be child porn even if the people appearing in it are over the age of 18. If they simply 'appear' to be underage that is enough.


child pornography material means:

(a) material that depicts a person, or a representation of a person, who is, or appears to be, under 18 years of age and who:

(i) is engaged in, or appears to be engaged in, a sexual pose or sexual activity (whether or not in the presence of other persons); or

(ii) is in the presence of a person who is engaged in, or appears to be engaged in, a sexual pose or sexual activity;

and does this in a way that reasonable persons would regard as being, in all the circumstances, offensive; or

(b) material the dominant characteristic of which is the depiction, for a sexual purpose, of:

(i) a sexual organ or the anal region of a person who is, or appears to be, under 18 years of age; or

(ii) a representation of such a sexual organ or anal region; or

(iii) the breasts, or a representation of the breasts, of a female person who is, or appears to be, under 18 years of age;

in a way that reasonable persons would regard as being, in all the circumstances, offensive; or

(c) material that describes a person who is, or is implied to be, under 18 years of age and who:

(i) is engaged in, or is implied to be engaged in, a sexual pose or sexual activity (whether or not in the presence of other persons); or

(ii) is in the presence of a person who is engaged in, or is implied to be engaged in, a sexual pose or sexual activity;

and does this in a way that reasonable persons would regard as being, in all the circumstances, offensive; or

(d) material that describes:

(i) a sexual organ or the anal region of a person who is, or is implied to be, under 18 years of age; or

(ii) the breasts of a female person who is, or is implied to be, under 18 years of age;

and does this in a way that reasonable persons would regard as being, in all the circumstances, offensive.
 

Absolutezero

real human bean
Joined
Nov 17, 2007
Messages
15,077
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
If you read the definition in the Act it's clear why this and the simpsons porn is covered. Both a sexual pose and a representation of an underage person.

Note too that under our law images may still be child porn even if the people appearing in it are over the age of 18. If they simply 'appear' to be underage that is enough.


child pornography material means:

(a) material that depicts a person, or a representation of a person, who is, or appears to be, under 18 years of age and who:

(i) is engaged in, or appears to be engaged in, a sexual pose or sexual activity (whether or not in the presence of other persons); or

(ii) is in the presence of a person who is engaged in, or appears to be engaged in, a sexual pose or sexual activity;

and does this in a way that reasonable persons would regard as being, in all the circumstances, offensive; or

(b) material the dominant characteristic of which is the depiction, for a sexual purpose, of:

(i) a sexual organ or the anal region of a person who is, or appears to be, under 18 years of age; or

(ii) a representation of such a sexual organ or anal region; or

(iii) the breasts, or a representation of the breasts, of a female person who is, or appears to be, under 18 years of age;

in a way that reasonable persons would regard as being, in all the circumstances, offensive; or

(c) material that describes a person who is, or is implied to be, under 18 years of age and who:

(i) is engaged in, or is implied to be engaged in, a sexual pose or sexual activity (whether or not in the presence of other persons); or

(ii) is in the presence of a person who is engaged in, or is implied to be engaged in, a sexual pose or sexual activity;

and does this in a way that reasonable persons would regard as being, in all the circumstances, offensive; or

(d) material that describes:

(i) a sexual organ or the anal region of a person who is, or is implied to be, under 18 years of age; or

(ii) the breasts of a female person who is, or is implied to be, under 18 years of age;

and does this in a way that reasonable persons would regard as being, in all the circumstances, offensive.
Yeah, there's some pretty strict stuff in there. We always have to be careful with representations of children in Creative Arts.
 

SnowFox

Premium Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2009
Messages
5,455
Location
gone
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2009
Its a game for christ sake(EDIT:DoA Game), yo can see princess peaches knickers on SSBB if you looked hard enough.
Im pretty sure all of their games have had the same characters, why no complaints then?

EDIT: LOL omie, thats something id expect on newgrounds lololol.
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top