Tully B.
Green = procrastinating
Man, what is with you? Why does every single one of your posts have to be about freedom? Talk about the damn topic or fuck off.Why do you hate freedom?
Man, what is with you? Why does every single one of your posts have to be about freedom? Talk about the damn topic or fuck off.Why do you hate freedom?
Why so hostile? If labor and persons in general are to be free, then so should there be freedom for prostitution. Prostitution is a voluntary sale of a labor service, and if we want to live in a free society (economic and socially) then the government has no right to prohibit or restrict such sales.Man, what is with you? Why does every single one of your posts have to be about freedom? Talk about the damn topic or fuck off.
Are you for the legalization of drugs? If not, then you're a hypocrite.Why so hostile? If labor and persons in general are to be free, then so should there be freedom for prostitution. Prostitution is a voluntary sale of a labor service, and if we want to live in a free society (economic and socially) then the government has no right to prohibit or restrict such sales.
Speaking of prostitution, who is some bureaucrat to take control of another adults body? the very notion or the idea of such infringes upon the prostitutes freedom to do what she wishes is tyranny.
It's legal to pay for sex everywhere.What are the current laws regarding prostitution? When is it legal/illegal?
yesAre you for the legalization of drugs?
If you have reached the natural phase to produce a child which therefore means reached puberty, you are by all means should have the rights to produce, sell, and watch sexual activity.Besides, what we're talking about is the legal age of such ventures (making porn, watching porn, prostituting). What's your opinion with regards to that?
Your concept of freedom is distorted. Allowing all children at the age of puberty (which is, for some, as early as 8 or 9) to have sex is simply wrong. It allows to much space for exploitation and abuse. That's not the kind of freedom anyone should want. The current legal age for sex, 16, is fine and provides a reasonable safeguard against abuse.yes
If you have reached the natural phase to produce a child which therefore means reached puberty, you are by all means should have the rights to produce, sell, and watch sexual activity.
Of course, even if such law did exist, the majority of the population would not adhere to such activities. However, if a small amount of the teenage populous did pursue this line of thought, they should be by all means do so. Who are we to stop them? who are we??
Well I'm glad that we're amusing you.I find it amusing how everyone refers to prostitutes as female by default.
Most prostitutes are women.I find it amusing how everyone refers to prostitutes as female by default.
They're the overwhelming majority. As such, it's not surprising given it's a profession defined by gender and sexuality.I find it amusing how everyone refers to prostitutes as female by default.
And that should be the crime. The exploitation and abuse.Your concept of freedom is distorted. Allowing all children at the age of puberty (which is, for some, as early as 8 or 9) to have sex is simply wrong.
It allows to much space for exploitation and abuse.
But the effect would of this law are the same: to reduce all teenagers to a subhuman level and to deprive everyone of the most precious part of his or her humanity—the freedom to choose. Are you telling me that if a 15 year old had consential sex with another 15 year old that they should be persecuted? This thought of line fundamentally violates the natural rights of all teenagers of such age to own their own body and therefore decide what they wish to do with that body.That's not the kind of freedom anyone should want. The current legal age for sex, 16, is fine and provides a reasonable safeguard against abuse.
No. If the abused did not want to have sex then it is a violation of her right and therefore a crime.Question 2: Do you think that we should legalize pedophilia and child molestation (as long as the abused have hit puberty)?
Well I do.Like if I were to ask you to think of a typical engineer, you don't immediately think of the fairer sex, or any feminine characteristic.
So am I.Well I'm glad that we're amusing you.
Oh, I'm aware of that. I just find it vaguely amusing because most people use 'he' as a generic reference; there's not many instances that we use she and it usually turns out to be some profession seen as demeaning. Like this one.They're the overwhelming majority. As such, it's not surprising given it's a profession defined by gender and sexuality.
Like if I were to ask you to think of a typical engineer, you don't immediately think of the fairer sex, or any feminine characteristic.
Do you really think a 10 year old boy/girl should be allowed to give consent to having sex just because they've reached puberty? That is the kind abuse I was talking about. There are many reasons why there should be a certain age of consent, many of which are simply a matter of science. Emotional/social intelligence does not come with immediately puberty, and thus there should be one, common age, before which children can't give consent, and after which they can.No. If the abused did not want to have sex then it is a violation of her right and therefore a crime.
Hmmm, who should tell him? Maybe he's worked it out by now. Or perhaps we really do have to elaborate.hmm, a male sex worker? are you telling me there are GIRLS out there paying for sex? lol elaborate.
While there is a business for hetero sex workers, mainly for older women and couples involving a woman, the main business for sex work for men is in the queer demographic. There's a surprisingly large amount of guys in their late teens through to late twenties who sell themselves in that market, regardless of their own orientation.hmm, a male sex worker? are you telling me there are GIRLS out there paying for sex? lol elaborate.
And that is why I believe to end this bickering the natural line is the best line. ie age of puberty. Its been working for thousands of years and done a great job.Do you really think a 10 year old boy/girl should be allowed to give consent to having sex just because they've reached puberty?
That is the kind abuse I was talking about. There are many reasons why there should be a certain age of consent, many of which are simply a matter of science. Emotional/social intelligence does not come with immediately puberty, and thus there should be one, common age, before which children can't give consent, and after which they can.
Extending all freedoms to all peoples at all ages sounds well and good, but it hinders freedom more than it maintains it. Lines must be drawn.
Are you sure? He could be legit.Freedom_ is a dodgy troll. Do with this information what you please.
Are you a troll? The only way I can ever tell is by asking.And that is why I believe to end this bickering the natural line is the best line. ie age of puberty. Its been working for thousands of years and done a great job.