You use 98 Octane in a Baleno? Does it improve performance much apart from the fuel economy?1997 Suzuki Baleno Sedan
98 Oct: I fill up at 780kms and it takes about 45L (51L tank)
So 45L/780kms = 5.77L/100kms
91 Oct: I fill up at 630kms and it takes about 40L (51L tank)
So 40L/630kms = 6.35l/100kms
Won't touch ethanol blend, ruins motor and uses heaps more
performance and fuel economy is almost negligible on cars with low compression ratios (nfi what the baleno has)You use 98 Octane in a Baleno? Does it improve performance much apart from the fuel economy?
Both my cars have compression ratios of 10.5:1 so they should in theory both benefit considerably from it.the na s15s (sr20de?) have a compression ratio of 9:1
the vw 1.6/8 engines in golfs/a3s/a4s have like 8.5:1
and b16a civics have >10:1
which explains what you find
but yeah, you only see a marked increase in mid-high end applications
placebo i reckon, dude 95 is not gonna knock at ~10:1.I used 98 about 50% of the time in my Civic FD 1.8L (current model Civic) and found that it had slightly better acceleration and fuel economy, but even then, it had a very small difference because I found that you tend to make more use of the slightly better acceleration when you have 98 which offsets the petrol saving.
Happened to my local Caltex. But what happened to the good ol' days where premium unleaded was 4c and 8c premiums over regular unleaded. Sigh.Is it just me or have all the Caltex service stations around here gotten rid of RON 91 and now only have Ethanol blend?