Scissors
Member
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2008
- Messages
- 933
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2008
okay, where da problem @?It labels them as violent, bllodthirsty, moronic extremists and the insult puts them amongst the lowest scum that inhabits the earth.
okay, where da problem @?It labels them as violent, bllodthirsty, moronic extremists and the insult puts them amongst the lowest scum that inhabits the earth.
From the Deputy israeli ambassador to the UN. Is that enough?"What kind of Humanitarian activists demand to bypass the United Nations, the Red Cross, and other internationally recognized agencies? What kind of peace activists use knives, clubs and other weapons to attack soldiers who board a ship in accordance with international law? What kind of Humanitarian activists, some with known terrorist history, embrace Hamas, a terrorist organization that openly shuns a two state solution and calls for Israel destruction, defying conditions set by the international community and the Quartet? The answer is clear: they are not peace activists; they are not messengers of good will. They cynically use a humanitarian platform to send a message of hate and to implement violence."
Please don't try to prove me wrong based off non-existent sources. I know what I'm talking about.he Israeli Army says it's identified 50 passengers on the ship with terrorist links.
It's known the flotilla of 6 ships was in part organized by the IHH group in Turkey, which reportedly has links to Al Qaeda. And three members of Yemen's Parliament, from the Islah Party, were also among the more than 600 activists detained by Israel after ships refused to stop for Israeli patrol boats and were boarded by Israeli Navy SEALs who eventually opened fire, killing 9 people. The Islah party is also said to have shadowy links to Al Qaeda. Both groups certainly support the Hamas organization in Gaza.
By referring to their supposed (and untrue) links with terrorists. israel insinuated that the activists were not activists but in fact, terrorists. perhaps not terrorists to the same degree as someone who is a paying member of al qaeda, but terrorists nonetheless.Didn't refer to the activists as terrorists just questioned their merits as peace activists.
"Our policy is this -- we try to let in all humanitarian goods into Gaza, all peaceful commodities, food, medicine, and the like. What we want to prevent coming into Gaza are rockets, missiles, explosives and war materials that could be used to attack our civilians. This is an ongoing policy and it was the one that guided our action yesterday. We told the flotilla of ships, we said, 'You can take all your cargo, put it in our port of Ashdod, we'll just ferret out if there are any war materials, and the rest will go through'.
"We succeeded in doing this peacefully with five of the six ships. The sixth ship, the largest, which had hundreds of people on it, not only did not cooperate in this effort peacefully, they deliberately attacked the first soldiers who came on the ship. They were mobbed, they were clubbed, they were beaten, stabbed, there was even a report of gunfire. And our soldiers had to defend themselves, defend their lives, or they would have been killed.
I believe that I did - I said that perhaps they were wrong to use violent tactics, but I also have maintained that they never did any of that, and that it was propaganda put out there by the IDF. This is not hard to swallow: I outlined numerous situations where the IDF has lied before.you are pretty pathetic to be honest, you have complete rose tinted goggles on this situation. you can only see it from one point of view. i've admitted that the israelis used excessive force, that there were mistakes made, but you haven't ONCE admitted any wrong doing by the activists.
I deny the first point as above, and I argue vigorously against the second point because the only reason why anyone would bring it up is in some kind of awful justification for the unneccesary and over-the-top murder of nine innocent civillians. assault is not, and should not, be punishable by death. self defense should be proportional.i don't see how you can deny that that mauled some of the troops to the point where they became fearful for their lives
I proved that this legal argument is questionable, and that all legal arguments in this case are questionable. That you are still trying to paint that as one-sided is absurd.that they went against the israelis orders under the San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea, which permits the attack of neutral merchant vessels that “are believed on reasonable grounds to be carrying contraband or breaching a blockade, and after prior warning they intentionally and clearly refuse to stop, or intentionally and clearly resist visit, search or capture.”
so?but the fact is they were using the situation for a political agenda
assuming the israelis have the right to give orders in international waters. this is questionable at best.they could have followed the israeli orders
Yeah glad we can atleast agree on this.its obvious...
Then why did you bring it up if it has no bearing to the argument seeing as you're 'not' using it to justify IDF's actions. And also, get over reputation level. It's an online forum ffs. And actually it was made clear that the reason I was getting neg repped was because of my religion through the comments that come along the 'rep'.Congratulations. Please link me the line where I justified their actions because they insulted them.
oh that's right, it's not there.
oh that's right, you're the idiot.
oh that's right, that's why everyone keeps neg repping you.
There's a fine line between culture and religion. You didn't want to use the word 'religion' because it would sound hypocritical seeing as you have been displaying anti-religion sentiments on numerous occasions whereas now you're defending Judaism as a religion or culture if you will.and religion is a form of culture, did you ever go to school?
Israel is an insane, incompetent state. Even their elite "commandos" are an international joke.The photos show that they didnt want to kill soldiers, rather than kill them, as the IDF spokesperson cleverly spinned it. You have proof that commandos were literally in the arms of activists, if they wanted to kill them they would have done it on the spot
If the aid workers wanted to kill these crying commandos they would have done it easly. They would have killed other soldiers by using these stupid guy's rifles but they just wanted to make them scare but the other soldiers came later and shot people randomly. Most of them were shot in the back what brave killers. if they knew that the other soldiers was going to shoot . Your cyring commandos and many others was going to be dead.
When your commandos get beaten and taken hostage by civilians armed with pipes what do you do? answer: make it look like a sign of the commandos restraint rather than weakness. Spin!
activists treating israeli commanods and protecting them
Learn to read kid.you fucking moron the ones landing at the start didn't have rifles.
Kid, stop trying to be an internet tough guy. You suck at it.yes but you said it was the truth when it wasn't at all grounded in reality.
You fucked up on BoS, prepare for a trolling/beating.Kid, stop trying to be an internet tough guy. You suck at it.
Besides, there are more productive and enjoyable pursuits than trolling to get forum users banned.
i like the way you try (and fail) to paint the IDF - the most brutal, inhuman, terrorist-like army in the world - as being an army of peace.you fucking moron the ones landing at the start didn't have rifles.