cheese_cheese
Member
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2011
- Messages
- 403
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2006
I am in two minds about this.
One one hand it is good that we are heading in the right direction towards a cleaner economy and cleaner energy production. Whether climate change is real or not is irrelevant. It doesn't go nearly far enough though.
On the other hand it will have economic consequences for Australia (exactly how much no one knows). If Australia goes alone it is hopeless and we simply hurt ourselves. As Andrew Bolt is always claiming, the tax will apparently reduce the world emissions by one four thousandth of a percent (1/4000 %) and he wants to know what temperature change that will result in. I'm not sure how accurate Bolts scientific number there is (notably no scientist will provide him with a figure or discredit his figure), although if we assume he is out hugely, even then Australia's contribution to reducing emissions is useless when China brings online a new coal fire power plant each week.
One one hand it is good that we are heading in the right direction towards a cleaner economy and cleaner energy production. Whether climate change is real or not is irrelevant. It doesn't go nearly far enough though.
On the other hand it will have economic consequences for Australia (exactly how much no one knows). If Australia goes alone it is hopeless and we simply hurt ourselves. As Andrew Bolt is always claiming, the tax will apparently reduce the world emissions by one four thousandth of a percent (1/4000 %) and he wants to know what temperature change that will result in. I'm not sure how accurate Bolts scientific number there is (notably no scientist will provide him with a figure or discredit his figure), although if we assume he is out hugely, even then Australia's contribution to reducing emissions is useless when China brings online a new coal fire power plant each week.