desmol
Member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2012
- Messages
- 47
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2012
Or just give him a job as a HSC marker hehe..send him back to uni!
lrn2epidemiology/10
Or just give him a job as a HSC marker hehe..send him back to uni!
lrn2epidemiology/10
psh, so he can screw all our marks too?Or just give him a job as a HSC marker hehe..
ohhh shizz. I forgot repetition. I said how lung cancer takes years to develop and he thinks his 1 min survey will find a link. what a troll.- he used some features of an epidemiological report, but it wasn't reliable, consistent, or accurate.
- small sample size
- didn't survey other demographics i.e. age, occupation, location
- he removed some people from the report, reducing the half female/half male control
- didn't consolidate his data with the reports of other scientists
- no assessment of relevance of questions asked
- no repetition with other parts of population
I don't even think I got 70 rawohhh shizz. I forgot repetition. I said how lung cancer takes years to develop and he thinks his 1 min survey will find a link. what a troll.
looking at around 75 raw I think. nooo band 6. (I assume the raw mark this year will be quite high)
which parts? short answers were nice. It wasn't just pure regurgitation, had to think a bit :LI don't even think I got 70 raw
so sad
i bombed it in hindsight. sigh. And I know my shit too!
Can't make a bad system worse...psh, so he can screw all our marks too?
imagine that. He's in charge of aligning, and uses james ruse as the standards for the rest of us (Similarly to how he only did the survey for a particular office)
I think i got a few wrong in MC, and idk. I could answer all the questions, but yknow when you're iffy about whether you're actually answering the question? That's how i felt. i felt it was too...simple and that I was forgetting so much or misinterpreting the question.which parts? short answers were nice. It wasn't just pure regurgitation, had to think a bit :L
I got question 16 MC wrong. but over all test was quite good. did you find it easier than 2011? (I though it was much simpler- less controversial LOL)
This is the guy who can't carry out a proper epidemiological study hereCan't make a bad system worse...
I think I said it before but yeah the paper took me the WHOLE 3 hours. (which is for most people - WAY too long) Because I read every question a few times and my answers just to make sure. but oh well, its over. don't really care that much about biology. just looking forward to all the beautiful maths tests coming.I think i got a few wrong in MC, and idk. I could answer all the questions, but yknow when you're iffy about whether you're actually answering the question? That's how i felt. i felt it was too...simple and that I was forgetting so much or misinterpreting the question.
i cant remember if i even attempted the 2011 paper tbh
And these are the people who think "transgenics" is a processThis is the guy who can't carry out a proper epidemiological study here
I mean, what genius takes a survey of less than 144 people and tries to make it a representation of a population?
I finished the exam in about an hour and a half and then went to the toilet. Then I came back and read through everything.I think I said it before but yeah the paper took me the WHOLE 3 hours. (which is for most people - WAY too long) Because I read every question a few times and my answers just to make sure. but oh well, its over. don't really care that much about biology. just looking forward to all the beautiful maths tests coming.
i did a curve.... of best fit.For the graph question, where it says sketch the curve of best fit, did you have to draw a straight line or a curve ><
I thought the answer was "transgenic"And these are the people who think "transgenics" is a process
What about that Macfarlane question? I can totally see him sitting there thinking "What can we do to ensure they're memorizing and regurgitating ALL the information?"
It was the answer, just incorrect word form - should have been "transgenesis"i did a curve.... of best fit.
I thought the answer was "transgenic"
I knew macfarlane like the back of my hand tbh. it was a huge part of search for a better health. Didn't people wonder how plasma b cells replicated so quickly in response to a specific antigen? it doesn't just come from anywhere
gurl, my teacher literally finished half of better health in a week, and then we rushed the entire communication optional the next week. then we had trialsIt was the answer, just incorrect word form - should have been "transgenesis"
We practically skimmed search for better health in class, and our textbook had about one paragraph about him in the introduction to the the chapter. Still, it wasn't technically a dot point
We spent most of our time on the stupid stuff like "what is health?" "what is disease?" etc etc and had to teach ourselves the restgurl, my teacher literally finished half of better health in a week, and then we rushed the entire communication optional the next week. then we had trials
I personally enjoyed that module though, so I studied it properly.
It was the answer?! YUUUUUUUSSSSSS.
not sure, but i did the cssa onesWe spent most of our time on the stupid stuff like "what is health?" "what is disease?" etc etc and had to teach ourselves the rest
What week did you have trials in?
I made the same mistake but hopefully the rest makes up for it, because it said "prevention strategies" or sthnot sure, but i did the cssa ones
also, i didn't mention antibiotics for the horse q because it said "viral" and i thought that meant "virus"
OH NO.
my methods were so ridiculous. I was like... BURN EVERYTHING THAT CAME IN CONTACT WITH IT. BURN IIIIIIITTTT.I made the same mistake but hopefully the rest makes up for it, because it said "prevention strategies" or sth