seanieg89
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2006
- Messages
- 2,662
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2007
'n' repetitions of the re-arrangement inequality.
Yeah, proving this is a bit easier than proving the rearrangement inequality.'n' repetitions of the re-arrangement inequality.
Though I guess this is cheating.
Consider:
I don't think cases are necessary but that looks about right. My solution:Consider:
You end up with something like this:
Now if you separate the into you can factor out the to get something like this:
Now we apply a rule to the term in the brackets:
1) If then we leave the term as it is.
2) If then we make the term
Now we will have two terms in the form:
and
Where in all cases from the rule above.
There will always only be two terms of this form, no more, no less. Combining them thus gives:
So all terms are as and thus:
Yer I think that's the same as my way just the reverse. You started from where as I worked towards that as the end result.I don't think cases are necessary but that looks about right. My solution:
And by all cases I meant all terms. i.e. all terms had and thus were positive.I don't think cases are necessary but that looks about right.
Ok, think about this.I have no idea how to do any of these inequalities
That compared to the inequalities we post is like comparing general maths to first year.Ok, think about this.
If you have two real numbers, and you do this:
What domain will the result be in?
ggThat compared to the inequalities we post is like comparing general maths to first year.