stupid_girl
Active Member
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2009
- Messages
- 221
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- N/A
isn't the integrand function undefined at ?
Yes, there is a removable singularity at x=0.isn't the integrand function undefined at ?
is this like a reverse chain + product rule integral or smth.
It's not my approach but you may try if it also works.is this like a reverse chain + product rule integral or smth.
do u just randomly make integrals for your own satisfaction?It's not my approach but you may try if it also works.
Judging from the upper and lower bounds, it may be a good idea to try the substitution u=1/x.
you don't?do u just randomly make integrals for your own satisfaction?
Hopefully I can introduce you another approach which is pure substitution and differential integration that I’m developing. However i need to prepare for trials atm!
Use the fact that for with equality holding for all x iff f(x) = 0.I’m quite stuck with this question, been doing for week. Pretty appreciate your help
I see I’ll check. Cuz i later figured out it’s Rolle theorem. Thank you, I’ll check them outUse the fact that for with equality holding for all x iff f(x) = 0.
I see, yeah i just realized. Thank you, I’ll fix itNote that so some of your working is incorrect.
Looking forward to your approach.Hopefully I can introduce you another approach which is pure substitution and differential integration that I’m developing. However i need to prepare for trials atm!
i like how this is just a reskin of the BOS Trials' cancerous arctangent integral