Search results

I'm memorising quotes on 3 paragraphs with an overarching theme, so if its a theme questions I just mould the theme with what the theme question asks for. ie lets say overarching theme was power and the question specifically asks for love, I would argue about the desire(love) for power which is...

Yea I think memorising 2-3 themes is sufficient, in terms of resonances and dissonances you can argue resonances as themes and dissonances as their portrayal of those themes/mode of the texts. If you prefer alternating then do alternating, either way works and I've seen people do very well with...

I think you are on track to a high 98 low 99 atar but definitely leaning more towards a high 98, but yea you still have Trials and HSC to turn the tides

I would say low modality, but yea I can't think of any other techniques atm.

I am planning to do something slightly similar and how I decided to link it was that money was central to the commercial human experience at the time. Then explain how this is shown through the sadness of the wealthy characters attributing how their human experiences of joy is not reliant on...

I don't do the crucible but idm reading it

Yea idm

Oh that. It doesn't tell which uni though?

That's true so who knows.

Lmao that'd be funny ngl, but I can only say what I've heard. Additionally, Greninja has posted wrong information before so...

I asked someone currently in the course. Who went Baulko, and they said there were 7 in their year. I really doubt they wouldn't know who in their med cohort went baulko and who didn't.

Actually 7 people from baulko made it to UNSW med last year. No offence but often times Greninja will say something about Baulko which is usually inaccurate. I mean its pretty obvious its wrong considering Baulko was ranked 2nd last year so you'd recon a decent chunk made it.

Honestly I'm gonna have to disagree. I think if done skilfully it could make for a good story. I find the best stories explore the psychopathy of their characters and do so well through the words. I will say its probably easier to go for a more physical story. Personally I interpret the question...

Send to me as well

I’d recommend always labelling the final paragraph as a recommendation

Oh lmao umm well that’s subjective I guess innit? I like to think this years cohort is just good at maths but maybe it’s just the exams are easy idrk...

High 80s and they only compare your 3U mark which is a lot harder to get 90+ than you’d think. Especially considering certain exams weren’t The easiest.

Hello. So basically the top 96 get in(but in reality they usually let a few extras with potential in)(like maybe 3 over who knows). Also the story of 95% and not getting in doesn't sound realistic since several people with 80's got in this year.

use the given equation itself substitute x=1 and y=-2 i.e. a(1)^3+b(1)^2-(1)+5=(-2) which gives the second equation a+b=-6 Then simultaneous equations your way.

When you receive your atar you get two marks the internal one the external one and the Hsc one, obviously he is referring to what he got in the HSC one of the two marks used to determine his overall mark) so in reality his internal mark does matter.