Search results

Yes, that's true - they're both good points. For those students who can't or don't want to spend $30, or don't mind an indeterminate timeframe, it's an alternative option though.

If your request is limited to personal information - that is, your own marks or scripts, rather than general marking criteria etc - you should be able to make a request under the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 2002 (NSW) instead of the FOI Act. Requests under that Act are free...

It's impossible to know unless you're one of the Board's judges. Any other person who attempts to guess may as well be giving you the equivalent of rand(0, 120). Just have to wait and see!

Denied. For all intents and purposes it's the same.

That's not true at all. Of course it's linear. There is a linear relationship between every raw mark and every aligned mark, and it is a different linear relationship for each performance band. Yes - thanks. I don't know where the ln x idea came from. No graphs have ever been published.

The answer to your question is yes. The purpose of the aligning process is to make marks from different years comparable between years.

No, it's imposible to tell - and even if we knew what the cut-offs were going to be, they wouldn't be of any use to anyone, because you can't know your raw mark for the examination paper until you've actually completed it. The raw examination marks are completely different to your school marks...

Is it every single hyperlink, or only some of them? (How are you able to post in this thread without being redirected?)

The difference is negligible.

My understanding is that they haven't received their marks yet - but (depending on your interpretation of recommendation 20.7) they should be released in due course. I don't think the raw mark sheets have an official name. The Board described them in this way to Hugh:

Your ranks (but not your marks) will be shown on Students Online from Wednesday 18 November 2009. You need to ask your school for your marks, or calculate them yourself.

Yes, the differences play a part as well. In most cases the relative differences between students' moderated assessment marks should be similar to the relative differences between their raw assessment marks.

OK guys, here's the deal, in simple terms. You might find it useful to follow along with this flowchart or this flowchart. The initial process Everyone starts off with an internal school assessment mark or a raw school assessment mark. That's the mark given to you by your school once you've...

Wow, what a blast from the past. I've attached the flowcharts from the previous posts. They were created back in 2003, so they are likely to need updating! In hindsight they look a bit simplistic but maybe that's what you need in a torts exam, I can't really remember.

The site should be significantly faster for everyone now. For the techies - Before: C:\Users\James>tracert 75.125.120.4 Tracing route to 75.125.120.4 over a maximum of 30 hops 1 2 ms 1 ms 2 ms www.routerlogin.com [192.168.0.1] 2 14 ms 14 ms 15 ms...

Scaled marks are calculated from raw HSC marks, which are the average of your raw examination mark and your moderated assessment mark. (flowchart 1) (flowchart 2)

Cem is correct. It doesn't affect you at all - if you're ranked first (and not just equal first), you're immune. Your assessment mark will be set equal to the top exam mark for your school.

Essentially, yes. So the speculation in this thread serves no purpose.

The process is illustrated by this flowchart.

They're good ideas. In the meantime, for a search function, you can construct a Google search string such as this one: site:boredofstudies.org king lear marxist It tells Google to search our resources and forum websites for those keywords. If you want to restrict it to resources and...